User talk:Wbh011

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Wbh011, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! DickClarkMises 19:32, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Kenneth Copeland. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tcrow777 talk 23:39, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking[edit]

If you continue to violate WP:VAND by blanking portions of pages and deleting content, as you have done to Kenneth Copeland and Hank Hanegraaff, you WILL be blocked. WAVY 10 17:05, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:[edit]

Those may not be completely accurate, but he is ~~part of~~ a leader in the Word of Faith movement, and his television ministry is where most people (such as myself) became familiar with him, so I think that would be a reason for the television evangelist category to stay. WAVY 10 18:35, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:re[edit]

I do agree that Kenneth Copeland Ministries is a Television Ministry etc. However, the "neutral" material on both WORD OF FAITH and TELEVISION EVANGELIST is not neutral. The body of WIKI is Critical and Scandals with external links to a few supporter of either one. Is this appropriate? Does someone need to begin reporting the POSITIVE WORK this organization as well as others is doing? PS: The only information removed was from Kenneth Copeland.

Re:re:re[edit]

We probably should, but the problem is that with this page, it seemed to be a promotional piece. So, I would do that BUT I would make sure it was entered in a way so it does not look like a puff piece. Also, your last response looks more like issues at the Word of Faith page as opposed to Copeland. If I offended you, I apologize; but my point was that at Wikipedia, you may need to be a bit more careful in how you handle information, and I have the page on my watchlist and apparently mistook it for vandalism. WAVY 10 19:13, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Posting--[edit]

WAVY 10-- i've changed order of words--the content is basically the same.. Does this work for you?

It's a start. As soon as I can find some biographical info for these articles below, I may come help on those.

WAVY 10 18:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you--