User talk:Weaktry

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Weaktry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 23:36, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Muhammad in Islam has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Muhammad in Islam was changed by Weaktry (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960665 on 2015-09-29T21:42:18+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:42, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A summary of important site policies and guidelines[edit]

Wikipedia is not censored. If material is reliably sourced, it is given due weight.
"Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
Primary sources are usually avoided to prevent original research. Secondary or tertiary sources are preferred for this reason as well.
Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for. In the case of science, this evidence must ultimately start with physical evidence. In the case of religion, this means only reporting what has been written and not taking any stance on doctrine.

Your edits to Muhammad in Islam have been reverted because they violate these policies. If you continue to engage in such disruptive behavior, you may find yourself blocked from editing the site.

Ian.thomson (talk) 23:36, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015[edit]

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to Muhammad in Islam, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:41, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Using multiple accounts[edit]

Are you User_talk:Simpleabd? Please note that using multiple accounts for one or more reasons is prohibited. See Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. -AsceticRosé 00:13, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:20, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]