Jump to content

User talk:Weaseloid

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
File:Wikipe-tan cat.png
DON'T TEASE THE WEASEL!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Weasel Fetlocks! Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Thanks for removing irrelevant photo

[edit]

Thank you for removing the irrelevant photo from the loaded question page. I concur with your decision and your reasoning.DougHill (talk) 02:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Weasel Fetlocks (talk) 11:23, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Zoidberg

[edit]

Good job with the removal of in-universe cruft from the article. Cheers. Beemer69 chitchat 05:37, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Now there's just the rest of the Futurama & Simpsons characters to work through! Yikes.  ;~\ Weasel Fetlocks (talk) 12:24, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm currently cleaning up the SpongeBob SquarePants character article. Most all of these cartoon-character articles are breeding grounds for cruft. Good luck. Beemer69 chitchat 02:34, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Futurama

[edit]

Sorry about the mix-up, I was just trying to prevent vandalism. You might want to make such deletions non-anonymously in the future and/or put something for the edit summary (e.g. "see talk page"). --Cybercobra (talk) 01:44, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it wasn't me who made the deletion first time around. It was an unregistered user, but they discuss this before deleting, & I was one of the editors who agreed with them. Weasel Fetlocks (talk) 10:07, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Setting of My Name Is Earl

[edit]

They mention Camden County which suggests Maryland. Also, the fact that they hang at the 'Crab Shack' and Darnell is referred to as 'Crab Man' also suggests Maryland as Maryland is known for its Crab industry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.255.55.180 (talk) 01:44, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Disney Jules Verne stamp.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 09:13, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo!

[edit]

How are you then? ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé(I am fine. I am a rabbit.) 03:10, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine thanks. I move home & start a new job in a couple of weeks time, which is great after being unemployed & stuck in a terminal rut for a very long time. I'm not here on wp much at all these days, but I'm still spending quite a lot of my time at That Other Site (at least til I start work). & How are you? Any plans to return to the Rathaus? weaseL FETLOckS 22:05, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Move home: Great! I'm glad to hear it. I take it you have already scheduled a big celebration to celebrate this? ^_^ Rathaus: Um, no, but thank you. ラビット The Black Rabbit of Inlé(Wabbits are always looking for an excuse to celebrate) 12:52, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really have big celebration plans yet. Will probably have some sort of celebration once I've moved. weaseL FETLOckS 14:07, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:The Handsome Family.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:The Handsome Family.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:07, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RationalWiki...

[edit]

...Is down until TMT fixes it, which might not be for days. Care to join the gang at Bob M's place? Totnesmartin (talk) 18:08, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's signature policy is saner than RationalWiki's

[edit]

Sorry Weaseloid, but you can't have templates or images in your sig. -- Nx / talk 13:38, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the warning. I've removed the image; will look at removing the template later. ωεαşεζǫįδMethinks it is a Weasel 18:25, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
RW has a sig policy? Totnesmartin (talk) 23:12, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Loosely. Policy might be too grand a word, but we do tend to nag people who don't sign their posts, or whose signatures cause problems. ωεαşεζǫįδMethinks it is a Weasel 23:28, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roadhouse Nights, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eddie Jackson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Weaseloid. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Weaseloid. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mononoke Kodama.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mononoke Kodama.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wowaconia (talk) 17:53, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Weaseloid. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sitting on Top of the World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bluegrass. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Titans Kraken.jpg has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]