Jump to content

User talk:Webwizard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Webwizard! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 14:09, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Just getting back

[edit]

Hi, Webwizard. My apologies for not responding sooner; as you probably surmised from my contribution history, I've been away for several months. I hope this issue got resolved, and in any event, I plan to be Wiki-editing regularly (if not often), so please do feel free to let me know if I can ever be of any help. With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 00:15, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you got to the two available pages just fine. The first question is: Was Glenn Cooper deleted via discussion (in which case there should be an archive of the discussion) or via speedy deletion? The first page you linked to in your post to me is for undeletion review of things for which there was a deletion discussion. The second page you linked to is for undeletion review of things that were speedily deleted (a process generally reserved for uncontroversially non-notable persons, hoax pages, etc.). Which of these two categories does Glenn Cooper fall into? --Tenebrae (talk) 17:35, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that's a deletion discussion, alright. Doesn't look like a lot of discussion went on, though, so one could appeal it at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Upon relisting, it had one keep and one delete. Not knowing anything about Cooper, such as whether the novels were self-published, for example, or how big/small/notable his companies were, about the only thing I might suggest is to make a case for notability through specific examples of what WP:RS journalists say about him. Might be more work than it's worth, but if not, go for it! Hope this helps. --Tenebrae (talk) 16:52, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Webwizard. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Webwizard. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

your signature

[edit]

Hi. I recommend changing Utente:Webwizard, and Discussioni utente:Webwizard to user, and user talk respectively. Regards, —usernamekiran(talk) 21:50, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Webwizard. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Big Trouble in Little China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Kwong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:02, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rick Moranis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soft reboot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:00, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Custom signature fix needed

[edit]

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error, specifically formatting tags that are in the wrong order.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
  3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
  4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Change the signature as shown below, or make other edits to make the signature appear how you want it to appear.
  3. Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Current signature:
<span style="color:#4169E1">'''[[user:Webwizard|<i><big>Web</big></i></span><span style="color:#00A86B">Wizard]]</span> - <span style="color:#960018">[[user talk:Webwizard|<small>Free entrance »» This way...</small>]]'''</span>

Fixed signature:
'''[[user:Webwizard|<span style="color:#4169E1"><i><big>Web</big></i></span><span style="color:#00A86B">Wizard</span>]] - <span style="color:#960018">[[user talk:Webwizard|<small>Free entrance »» This way...</small>]]</span>'''

More information is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:02, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]