Jump to content

User talk:WeepSorcerer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vandalism?[edit]

Hi,

I saw what you posted in the talk page of the War of the Spanish Succession article.

(1) You said: look at his last edit on the Battle of Almanza. This is worse than vandalism because the mistake he made, a very important mistake, will not be picked up by a casual editor.

Which is the important mistake I made? A very important mistake? Look, I edited the coats of arms from the Battle of Almanza article like 1 or maybe 2 months ago. And I re-edited it yesterday or so because Albrecht had removed it without any reason. That's all.

(2) Then you said: Now have a look at the infobox he added to the Siege of Barcelona. His incompetence personifies everything that is bad about Wikipedia.

I don't think I understand you... I got the information and the flags from the warbox that you can find in the same article of the Spanish and Catalan wikipedias: 1 & 2. I don't understand what's wrong with that.

So all in all you accuse me of two things: having edited the article Battle of Almanza two months ago, doing a very big mistake and taking an infobox from the Catalan and Spanish wikipedias to expand the English article (1 & 2).

What's wrong with that?


Oh, and about the Austriacist and Bourbonic factions in the War of the Spanish Succession article, I think I've explained it very well. You haven't refuted my arguments, you just insult me. At first, I added the factions without any reference, but Albrecht removed me all the time without any justification, so I re-added them again all the time. Finally, I decided to create the reference, in which other users contributed. And now Albrecht keeps removing the factions but adding an old version of my reference (which I don't understand, because (1) the reference is linked to the addition of these two factions and (2) if there is a new version of the reference why do you wanna add the old one?). It's a manipulation of what I wrote. And no one has explained why is that being done, you just remove it all the time, so I add it...

Onofre Bouvila 23:42, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]