User talk:Weird gloop

July 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Moesha have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Moesha was changed by Weird gloop (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862842 on 2022-07-28T16:56:03+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:56, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Parkers, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 17:56, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that Weird gloop (talk) 18:01, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that it's my first time on this site so sorry Weird gloop (talk) 19:48, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce jokes into articles, as you did at All of Us, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. InvadingInvader (talk) 19:45, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry again I'm trying to improve i guess larry lockett said something Weird gloop (talk) 22:06, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We're trying to help you improve. If you have questions about anything that's said, feel free to ask. The worst thing to do is to reinsert the same wording back into an article if you don't understand why it was taken out the first time though. Larry Hockett (Talk) 02:22, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah personally i agree so do you think can help me improve please Weird gloop (talk) 02:27, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to help - as long as you don't go back in and reinsert anything that we have already taken out or edited. If you have questions about why certain things were edited, just go to the article and click on View History. That way you can see the edit summaries for each edit that was made. If someone's edit summary was unclear, you could ask them a question about it on their user talk page or on the article talk page.

In most cases, your edits are being adjusted because of grammar mistakes or unclear writing. There are some edits, like the ones about cancellations of shows, that really should have citations to reliable sources. That way it doesn't sound like we are writing opinion pieces about the shows. Larry Hockett (Talk) 02:41, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok cool thanks for the advice i'll add more sources and citations the next time i'll edit something Weird gloop (talk) 03:08, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did with this edit to One on One (TV series). Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Tow (talk) 03:15, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:43, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't two weeks is fair i was trying to make a point not make disruptive edits on your platform please give me another chance this my first time on here i just need a little guidance 2 weeks come on i deserve a second chance Larry Hockett just talked to me about please?????? Weird gloop (talk) 03:54, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]