User talk:Welcome2wikiworld

Proposed deletion of Shake Off the World

Hello, Welcome2wikiworld

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username James-the-Charizard and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Shake Off the World, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|James-the-Charizard}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

James-the-Charizard (talk to me!) (contribs) 14:46, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shake Off the World for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shake Off the World is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shake Off the World until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DMacks (talk) 17:20, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. — Newslinger talk 09:32, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

utrs #29071

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Welcome2wikiworld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #29071 was submitted on 2020-02-20 17:44:47. This review is now closed.

Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:58, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Welcome2wikiworld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you for taking the time to read this request. As I have discovered, Wikipedia is extremely complex, and rightfully so. I understand that we all want Wikipedia to be as accurate and reliable as possible. Two accounts that I have created, Welcome2wikiworld and Thescholarlyinsight, were meant to bring accuracy and reliability to the Wikipedia database, and that seems to have been lost in translation. I really have learned a great deal from the admins, and wish to continue contributing to the world of Wikipedia, but with a better understanding of how to navigate the community. I hope you understand and will consider this request.

Decline reason:

Since Thescholarlyinsight is the older of the two accounts, you'll need to submit an unblock request from that account on User talk:Thescholarlyinsight. — Newslinger talk 01:42, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.