User talk:Wen Hsing

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Wen Hsing, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - Esn 05:08, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit[edit]

In this edit, you added statements disputing the Guardian article and yet provided no reliable source which would mirror your views. As you can see by reading WP:V, the goal of wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. Please acquaint yourself with that policy page. If you can find a reliable source to support the view that the allegations in the Guardian article are incorrect, you are free to add your statements back in, along with a link. Otherwise, if you continue to change it without offering a source, your edits will violate wikipedia policy and will be seen as vandalism. Esn 05:08, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many apologies, I mistake. I will be showing more careful in future editing processes.Wen Hsing 20:27, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your help with Chinese characters[edit]

I wrote this originally on the AFD we are both participating in, but it's off-topic there and is a request for some help from you - I would appreciate your input/answers and temperate attitude on Chinaman = 支那人 a section on Talk:Chinaman in which the question of how "Chinaman" is distinguished from "Chinese man" (zhuong guo ren) in Chinese, as the other Chinese-speakers on the page won't answer what the meaning of the characters is...i.e. is the Chinese-language rendering of "Cbinaman" explicitly derisive in word-meaning/etymology. Because the English word isn't explicitly derisive in its etymology, the implication being that "Chinaman" has been misrepresented within the Chinese language by dint of the choice of characters used to render it....all I've gotten is that one Chinese-speaker on the page disagrees with the other Chinese-speaker as to what means what, and which is offensive; I want to know why those characters are derisive/offensive, i.e. what each character represents/means. Maybe you ca give me the straight answer that others have been avoiding, or too impolite to address (but pls follow this up on Talk:Chinaman because it's not directly relevant to the AFD).Skookum1 08:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abstentions on AfDs[edit]

Hsing, why on Earth are you abstaining from AfDs like you did here? Abstaining in an AfD is a waste of your time, sir. Abstaining is only useful in a vote where you have been obligated to participate. Not only is AfD not a vote, but participation is not compulsory. Please don't squander any more of your effort on abstentions. A Train^talk 12:45, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Final Fantasy VI talkpage[edit]

Please do not leave disruptive comments about the topics we feature. As an online, user-contributed encyclopedia, Wikipedia can cover a larger range of topics, permitted they provide substantial out-of-universe perspective. Thank you. — Deckill er 16:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The goal is to balance fiction articles with real-world and in-universe exposition. These articles aren't all about the game itself; they encompass the entire product and project to create the product. Once this goal (treating fiction on Wikipedia correctly) can be attained across the entire Final Fantasy project, then I will be satisfied enough that other fictional projects here on Wikipedia can follow suit. Then I'll focus on my other topics of interest, such as locations, history, and business. However, for the time being, something has to be done about our coverage of fiction. — Deckill er 17:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps we together may be in "agreement to disagree". Possibility in future you understand I am more correct. Wen Hsing 17:24, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, you're wrong. The fact that you insult a large number of adults across the world by impying only childlike minds enjoy video games, and furthermore doing it with incohrent words, pretty much deflates your case fully. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ 17:41, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did not intent implication you have suggest! If only adult only play the Final Fantasy it becomes less harmful. In China we have serious trouble, social catastrophe fundamentally resulting from excessive fixation and cultural poison of such non-real 'games'. It is most harm to the children with the malleable mindset. I apologize for my terrible English, I am not native speaker, but improvement gradually. Wen Hsing 17:50, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nevertheless, we cover a range of topics, both positive and negative. For instance, we cover the Holocaust, which is probably more severe than what video games are doing to children. — Deckill er 19:04, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Holocaust was significant tragedy, while game is minor poison, not worthy of the Wikipedia Project, please consider health and standing of Wikipedia ProjectWen Hsing 06:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on United States[edit]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to United States, you will be blocked from editing. —DCGeist 05:41, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is untrue allegation, I have request clarifications from you. Official complaint will be following if apologize not forthcoming. Wen Hsing 04:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To quote a very wise, ancient Chinese philosopher (you can look him up here!), "I normally am most polite, but you Shitler talk, it trigger me shout Fuck to you!"—DCGeist 05:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:Why you make quotations of this irrelevancy, I was force to engage crudity by the vulgar talk by this person. Wen Hsing 08:38, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to look at who's accusing you[edit]

You (and others including me) have been accused of being vandals by overzealous and impolite Wikipedia users. You seem a bit confused, I suggest you read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:United_States#Are_bear_attacks_really_relevant_in_this_broad_overview_of_an_article.3F —Preceding unsigned comment added by Humanproject (talk • contribs) 10:59, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ChairmanOfTheBoard.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading this image. Could you please upload it to Wikimedia Commons instead, and also provide some additional information as well as OTRS Verification? If you have questions about these 3 requests, let me know and I can try to be of assistance. Cirt (talk) 13:37, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This image which you have uploaded has been moved to Wikimedia Commons - where it is now up for deletion in a deletion discussion here Commons:Deletion requests/Image:David Miscavige ChairmanOfTheBoard.jpg. Your input would be appreciated to provide further information on how you obtained this image. Cirt (talk) 20:27, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:ChairmanOfTheBoard.JPG[edit]

Image:ChairmanOfTheBoard.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:David Miscavige ChairmanOfTheBoard.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:David Miscavige ChairmanOfTheBoard.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:26, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ChairmanOfTheBoard.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:ChairmanOfTheBoard.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:26, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]