Jump to content

User talk:Whatdamn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Whatdamn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Hello and..

[edit]

Hi, I notice that your name for its too blatant meaning. I suggest you to change your name through Wikipedia:Changing username to prevent you from undergoing possible unpleasant things due to the name. I hope you enjoy editing English wikipedia. --Appletrees (talk) 00:00, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And by the way...

[edit]

Are you an old user returned under a new name? Fut.Perf. 17:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IP user in school hostel. but, I first edit liancourt rocks article. Whatdamn (talk) 17:10, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

!

[edit]

영어에 도음이 필요하시다면 돕겟습니다. 한자를 쓰는데는 좀 부족하지만, 한글을 웬만큼은 이해할수 있읍니다. o.d.s.t. : feet first into hell (talk) 00:46, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll have it ready within two days, since I am busy with schoolwork. o.d.s.t. : feet first into hell (talk) 05:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Whatdamn (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Really, I'm not sock. I just revert from old article. that's all. It is rv. from old article. it is 'sin'? really, indefinite block is too hard and unreasonable. i'm a constructive editor. and did based on fact edit. do not block indefinitely

Decline reason:

reason — even if you're not a sock, which I'm not convinced of your innocence, I'd block this for a username violation.RlevseTalk 01:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reviewing admin - please see [[1]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spartaz (talkcontribs)

Regardless of whether or not your edits were in good faith, your name is probably inappropriate under our username policy. --B (talk) 17:33, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, Friend. I can't understand.

Wow, talk of cheekiness. Well, by doing that lightning-quick copy-and-paste move, Whatdamn has certainly demonstrated he's not a new user but some kind of sock. Indef-blocked now. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

I just rv. from old article. is it 'sin'? i'm a constructive editor. i did not any violation wikipedia policy. really, indefinite block is too hard and unreasonable. Whatdamn (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

translation

[edit]

If you still need the english translation you gave to Odst, or any other translation of Korean text, you can always ask me. Cheers. Oyo321 (talk) 17:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]