User talk:Wheelierecord

Welcome!

Hello, Wheelierecord, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! MrPrada (talk) 06:21, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Guys[edit]

I hope you all will check out the improvments I made on my wikipedia page. I really added alot more to give ref to the information I published. ~wheelierecord~ 4:57am April 2nd

AfD[edit]

Robert, welcome to wikipedia. I'd like to ask you to please keep the diatribe <small>. The AfD itself is really for Keep, Delete, or Comment, based on policies such as WP:N or WP:V. If you have further details, please use Wikipedia Talk:Articles for deletion/Robert M. Hensel. Please read Wikipedia:Guide to deletion, Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Right now, all you really need to do is provide verified, second and third party sources. Your blog is a primary source. See WP:Sources. Itss assertion may be true, but try finding it in a secondary source such as the New York Times and at least one other paper before inserting it again, as I did when I searched for you in Google News. MrPrada (talk) 06:21, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, I've moved it all to the Talk page. If you'd like to leave another comment, please try to address the specific concern of WP:N. MrPrada (talk) 06:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spina bifida[edit]

Hold On: I would like the information I added to be included in the Spina bifida section of Wikipedia listed under People of note with spina bifida.. Please note that I hold all copy rights to what I added.

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Robert M. Hensel. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://wheelierecord.tripod.com/index.html and associated pages in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Robert M. Hensel with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Robert M. Hensel with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Robert M. Hensel saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Your original contributions are welcome. --Finngall ^talk 20:15, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Henselautograph01.jpg.w180h165.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Henselautograph01.jpg.w180h165.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:09, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Robert M. Hensel[edit]

Thank you for your question. I can't "put in a good word" to keep the article (i.e. I could, but I won't do it because it would violate principles of neutrality), but I can advise you about Wikipedia's inclusion criteria.

Biographical articles need to meet a standard of notability that we abbreviate as WP:BIO. The guiding principle is that the person must be cited in third-party references, such as news reports or magazines or television or radio, for doing something important that an encyclopedia reader would want to know about. Thus, adding a dozen external links to apparently random websites is not helpful. If you could add links to specific websites showing how people respect this fellow's poetry and Guinness World Record, that might help.

You should also keep in mind our guidelines about conflict of interest, which I will copy here:

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Shalom ^Hello 18:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright and other information[edit]

Hi!

I have copy edited your article (and merged the two), you should probably not edit it yourself (nor should your wife, or close friends and family (or indeed enemies...).
Everything you upload to Wikipedia, that is your intellectual property you release under GFDL.
Congratulations on your record, whether it makes you notable I can't say.
Search engine entries - these do not make you notable (try my name - I don't rate a WP article).
See International Biographical Centre.

Best of luck. Rich Farmbrough, 21:45 25 September 2007 (GMT).

Speedy deletion of Robert M. Hensel[edit]

A tag has been placed on Robert M. Hensel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ArcAngel (talk) 23:17, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Robert M. Hensel[edit]

An editor has nominated Robert M. Hensel, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert M. Hensel and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:00, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Roberthensel jpg w300h225.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Hi Wheelierecord!
We thank you for uploading Image:Roberthensel jpg w300h225.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 17:02, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Robert Michael Hensel.jpg.w180h165.jpg[edit]

The file File:Robert Michael Hensel.jpg.w180h165.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:RobertHensel.jpg[edit]

The file File:RobertHensel.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]