User talk:Whitehandnerdy

Speedy deletion nomination of Holy Koolaid

Hello Whitehandnerdy,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Holy Koolaid for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. →Σ σ ς. (Sigma) 03:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lee Burvine for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lee Burvine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Burvine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Softlavender (talk) 02:41, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Seth Andrews. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Softlavender (talk) 20:02, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Catholic Church, you may be blocked from editing. Ian.thomson (talk) 20:14, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]