Archive from 21 June 2009 to 8 August 2011[edit]

Why did you rename the National University of Kyiv Mohyla Academy article?[edit]

The official name of the university can be seen at its website here http://www.ukma.kiev.ua/eng_site/index.php as National University of Kyiv Mohyla Academy. Could you please explain why did you rename it to National University of Kiev Mohyla Academy? What is the basis of this decision? Renaming the old Academy has a basis in the fact that it is commonly used in the literature on the subject. However, the modern university is known under the fixed name National University of Kyiv Mohyla Academy. Therefore, it is confusing to call it not by the official name. We can keep the name of the old Academy as Kiev Acedemy, also the Kiev theological seminary. However the modern institution having an official name the way it has it should be referred to correctly regardless of the historical predecessors. Silin2005 (talk) 10:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Geir Ellingsrud.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Geir Ellingsrud.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kjetil_r 23:19, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to District of Đakovica, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. kedadial 16:41, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Unikar.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Unikar.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]