User talk:Wickedangry

Welcome

this is my talk page. do not post unimportant messages on my talk page. i don't give a fuck about the tea house or anything like that.

May 2013

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at List of captive orcas, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Stop with the name-calling this instant. -- McDoob AU93 15:25, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:No personal attacks, you may be blocked from editing. NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Justin Bieber, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 04:27, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jackmcbarn. I noticed that you recently removed all content from User:NeilN, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:02, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --McDoob AU93 02:51, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruption to the encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. m.o.p 03:13, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

new account

since i am possibly not going to be unblocked, i made a new account. should have thought of this a long time ago Thegman6072 (talk) 02:37, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

unblock or change to a different kind of block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wickedangry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

change the block from indefinitely to a month or other amount of time. I don't want to be blocked forever Wickedangry (talk) 00:41, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. only (talk) 00:59, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock me. wont make any disruptive edits

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wickedangry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise not to make anymore disruptive edits. I just want to fix my old edits that random IP addresses keep changing. I wont make anymore disruptive edits. I was blocked for making disruptive edits but now I am trying to fix my old edits that were made years ago and wiki admins such as User:Kinu and others were perfectly fine with those edits before but now all of a sudden, they are deleting them. I made other accounts such as WickedAngry2 and I made edits to my old edits that were being vandalized and I was just minding my own business trying to protect my edits but I would get blocked for block evasion even though my edits were non-disruptive. I don't want to keep having to make new accounts to make sure my non-disruptive edits are not deleted for no reason at all. please unblock this account. Wickedangry (talk) 22:18, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes, your other accounts kept getting blocked for evading the block on this account. You don't "have" to keep making new accounts -- you specifically are not allowed to do that, and doing so has made it much less likely this account will ever be unblocked. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 00:28, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You've been blocked numerous times for the same type of disruption, even after you promised you would stop. You continue to create sockpuppets, promise you won't create more, and then continue to do so. I see no evidence that allowing you to edit (whether it be from this account or one of your many sockpuppets) is helpful to Wikipedia. I'm revoking your access to this talk page; repeatedly posting the same type of unblock is a waste of our time and yours. Find another hobby. --Kinu ^t/_c 01:17, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.