User talk:Wifione/Archive 2011 (May)
The Signpost: 2 May 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Picture of the Year voting begins; Internet culture covered in Sweden and consulted in Russia; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Physics of a WikiProject: WikiProject Physics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two new cases open – including Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Call for RTL developers, varied sign-up pages and news in brief
GOCE drive newsletter
[edit]The Guild of Copy Editors – May 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive The Guild of Copy Editors invite you to participate in the May 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive, a month-long effort to reduce the backlog of articles that require copy-editing. The drive began on May 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on May 31 at 23:59 (UTC). The goals of this backlog elimination drive are to eliminate as many articles as possible from the 2009 backlog and to reduce the overall backlog by 15%. ! NEW ! In an effort to encourage the final elimination of all 2009 articles, we will be tracking them on the leaderboard for this drive. Awards and barnstars We look forward to meeting you on the drive! Your GOCE coordinators: SMasters, Diannaa, Tea with toast, Chaosdruid, and Torchiest |
You are receiving a copy of this newsletter as you are a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, or have participated in one of our drives. If you do not wish to receive future newsletters, please add you name here. Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editorsusing AWB on 09:12, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 May 2011
[edit]- In the news: Billionaire trying to sue Wikipedians; "Critical Point of View" book published; World Bank contest; brief news
- WikiProject report: Game Night at WikiProject Board and Table Games
- Features and admins: Featured articles bounce back
- Arbitration report: AEsh case comes to a close - what does the decision tell us?
What are You talking about?
[edit]Αθτα που μου παρεθεσες σαν στοιχεια φιλε μου ,δεν λενε τιποτα για 4% Αλβανιας κιολας,δεν γελας με το να το λες κιολας. βρες το ακριβες χωριο αλλιως μην κανεις υποθεσεις Η Αλβανια εχει 20% Ελληνικη μειονοτητα στην πραγματικοτητα αν το παροθμε ετσι αλλα δεν αναγραφεται στο αρθρο της . Μηπως εχεις δει το προτοκολλο της Ελλαδας ? 98% Ελληνες και 2% αλλοι look by yourself :http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/travel-and-living-abroad/travel-advice-by-country/country-profile/europe/greece/ if You dont see it yet,WATCH THIS TOO ALSO: http://www.buyusa.gov/greece/en/profileofgreece.html or THIS:http://www.kwintessential.co.uk/resources/global-etiquette/greece-country-profile.html (wnen we lie we are bud boys,didnt tell it You someone,please?) —Preceding unsigned comment added byAperitis25 (talk • contribs) 11:01, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
- I understand. Have left a reply on your talk... Wifione ....... Leave a message 19:05, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 May 2011
[edit]- WikiProject report: Back to Life: Reviving WikiProjects
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motions - hyphens and dashes dispute
- Technology report: Berlin Hackathon; April Engineering Report; brief news
Mitchell Heisman
[edit]Hey Big Brother, I was wondering if maybe you would reconsider letting the truth get out —Preceding unsigned comment added by151.203.236.210 (talk) 00:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Quick apology
[edit]...if my statements on the 3RR noticeboard sounded affronting. Not meant to be that way, but reading it again, I felt my words might come out worse than intended. My apologies. Kind regards. Wifione ....... Leave a message 17:43, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hey, no offense taken, I totally understand what you were saying! Thanks much for the apology! Dreadstar☥ 17:50, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. Appreciate that. Take care. Wifione ....... Leave a message 17:51, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 May 2011
[edit]- News and notes: GLAM workshop; legal policies; brief news
- In the news: Death of the expert?; superinjunctions saga continues; World Heritage status petitioned and debated; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Formula One
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Injunction – preliminary protection levels for BLP articles when removing PC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Sent you one. — HelloAnnyong(say whaaat?!) 16:01, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oh thanks. Replied. Kind regards. Wifione ....... Leave a message 16:09, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Your block on OptimusPrimeRibs
[edit]I read the Admin notice pages a lot (for learning ) I noticed your block on OPtimusPrimeRib and wasn't sure he was in the wrong for adding in "self-described". The reference in the page for that entry does point to the Berkley Trade, but it's an interview with John Edwards, so. he is, in effect describing himself as a psychic / medium. There are no other ref's than that one for it. As BLP's need to be sourced reliably and since extraordinary claims need extraordinary proof, and as we have only his word, as given to the Berkley Times, it looks like OptimusPrimeRib was right. Yeah, he messed up by saying he'd edit war, but that was after he was blocked in the first place. For full disclosure, I have no stake in that article, I never edited it, but I do question the initial block on Optimus. Any thoughts? KoshVorlon' Naluboutes AeriaGloris 17:29, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hi. He was blocked for 3RR. Do write back if you need more clarifications. Regards. Wifione ....... Leave a message 17:32, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- Also see Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Paranormal#Adequate_framing. (updated link to actual decision) Dreadstar ☥ 17:59, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, but was he actually edit warring, BLP has a notable exemption for 3RR:
- Yes, but was he actually edit warring, BLP has a notable exemption for 3RR:
- Also see Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Paranormal#Adequate_framing. (updated link to actual decision) Dreadstar ☥ 17:59, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Removal of libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced contentious material that violates the policy on biographies of living persons (BLP). What counts as exempt under BLP can be controversial. Consider reporting to the BLP noticeboard instead of relying on this exemption.
John Edwards told the Berkly Trade that he was a medium, it was sourced as such in the article, so it would be appropriate to use "Self described", because that's just what happened. He removed "medium" and replaced it with "Self-described medium" which reflects what the sole source shows. Near as I can tell, he never should have been blocked to begin with, as his reverts fell under the 3rr exemption for BLP. The Paranormal link you and Dreadstar pointed me to is a proposed decision and not a final decision. It's not a policy, nor a guideline, but rather a decision that's being proposed. You follow ? KoshVorlon' NaluboutesAeria Gloris 19:26, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- No, that's incorrect, there was no WP:BLP violation, so no exemption from WP:3RR. There are multiple sources that talk about Edward being a medium, whether they believe it or not, the article does not rely on a 'sole source'. Berkley Trade did not 'interview' Edward, as you indicate above, they are the publisher of his book One Last Time and it includes quotes from others stating that Edward is a medium, so there's no chance at all there is a BLP vio on this. And the ArbCom link I provided is indeed a passed Principle: Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Paranormal#Adequate_framing; sorry for the incorrect link - I've corrected it. Dreadstar ☥ 19:39, 25 May 2011 (UTC)