User talk:Wiglaf
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Wiglaf has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
You can leave a message below
I hope... Idk. Don't give up. Take it back, or whatever. None of you, ever... hej Vigleif. pa sidan http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svearike har du (??) skrivit :
Kristofers landslag från år 1442 står det att det inte får finnas mer än en kung i Sverige och detta riket är av hedna värld sammankommet av Svea och Göta riken. Sveriges historia blir nu hela rikets, länderna ett land.
-vilket ej stämmer savitt jag kan se. den korrekta ordföljden fran landslagen torde vara:
är av hedna värld sammankommet av Svea och Göta land?
Observera land här, inte rike....
Rätta mig om jag har fel!
http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskussion:Svearike
mvh
Dan Koehl 15:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can[edit]
|
The article Brisingamen, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup. If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page. |
Svanhild image[edit]
Hi Wiglaf, I like the Svanhild image, where did you find it? Thx,
Jutes[edit]
The Jutes article received heavy editing today by unregistered users, which I noticed at WikiRage.com. The article may benefit from a good review. According to Wikipedia Page History Statistics, you are one of the top contributors to that page. If you have the time, would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. -- Jreferee (Talk) 07:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
siwíoniz och senare swi-oniz kan uttolkas som sjö-, eller havsfolket[edit]
Wiglaf, känner du till vad för publikation som Schagerström 1931 publicerade sin teori? Se http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskussion:Svear
mvh
Dan Koehl (talk) 22:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Frith (druidry), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
I know you did not author it originally (cropped from the main, and factual, Frith article), but the rules here seem to want us to notify the article creator, so here 'tis. 216.69.219.3 (talk) 01:14, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:180px-Ottar03.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:180px-Ottar03.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 16:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Hamund[edit]
I have nominated Hamund, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamund. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 21:37, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Stone ship.JPG[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Stone ship.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 23:55, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Stonecircle.JPG[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Stonecircle.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 00:06, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
File:Stonecircle.JPG listed for deletion[edit]
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stonecircle.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 16:57, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Hacker (folklore)[edit]
I have nominated Hacker (folklore), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hacker (folklore). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Plrk (talk) 11:18, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
File source problem with File:08 B image.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:08 B image.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:13, 6 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:13, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Small elf.JPG[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Small elf.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:11, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Small elf.JPG[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Small elf.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Thuresson (talk) 22:20, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Ingjald.gif[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ingjald.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 15:11, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
File:Sowilo.gif listed for deletion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sowilo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:08, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Yrsa learns of her true father's identity.jpg[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Yrsa learns of her true father's identity.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Hervarar saga ok Heiðreks for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hervarar saga ok Heiðreks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hervarar saga ok Heiðreks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:48, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Scedenigge listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Scedenigge. Since you had some involvement with the Scedenigge redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 05:42, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Roman Iron Age for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roman Iron Age is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Iron Age until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doug Weller talk 15:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Yngling family tree[edit]
Template:Yngling family tree has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 23:32, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
The article Druhtinaz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:NOTDICT, all "refs" here are to dictionaries (of etymology), all info is definition or etymology.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chiswick Chap (talk) 04:56, 9 April 2017 (UTC)