User talk:Wiikipedian

Archives

/Archive 1 (2007)

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Mix FM (Malaysia) appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 13:52, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I reverted to revision on 05:54, 1 January 2008, those WP:NPOV contents are added yesterday. Wikipedian 13:58, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great job on doing so! It looks MUCH better this way. Warning striped(Voided) Feel free to remove it altogether if you want. --Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 14:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Penitenciaría Federal de Sona

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Penitenciaría Federal de Sona, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 16:14, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Double redirects

When moving pages, as you did to Garter belts, please remember to fix any double redirects. These can create slow, unpleasant experiences for the reader, waste server resources, and make the navigational structure of the site confusing. (Specifically, when you merged Garter belts into Garter (stockings), you forgot to check for the double redirects it created. I've now done this and corrected them, but just thought I'd tell you so you know to check for them next time.) Terraxos (talk) 19:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

Stop removing valid references from pages as you have done twice on Las Vegas (TV series). If you continue, your actions will be reported. KellyAna (talk) 15:18, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not a dead link. Here's the link that's referenced [1] and it's alive and kicking and removing it is considered vandalism. Don't do it again. KellyAna (talk) 05:07, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Someone please tell me if http://www.tvfodder.com/archives/2007/03/james_caan_nikk.shtml is a dead link, TIA. Wikipedian 06:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't appear to be, no. Pump me up 06:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Works perfectly for me. Cheers, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 06:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ty y'all, I think it's just me. Wikipedian 06:06, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox actor

Your code won't work if a birthname and or birthdate is not used. User:Wiikipedian/Sandbox User:Wiikipedian/Sandbox You need to work on it a bit more. --_pete 17:23, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Friends

I was wondering why you reverted my edits[2] to this template, the purpose of a navigational template is to allow users to easily navigate around a topic and I do not see the disadvantage of adding the episode pages. The template is small and the addition did not make it unsightly or unusable. Most other navboxes for a TV series where there are only a small number of episodes with pages include links to those pages. Examples: Template:Scrubs, Template:Firefly, Template:Fawltytowers. As you didn't give an edit summary or make a comment on the talk page I was just wondering what your reasoning was. Guest9999 (talk) 16:51, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wiikipedian, I noticed you reverted a few of my edits that removed the "navbar=plain" option. This option was really only designed for a few meta-templates, and shouldn't be used for regular templates like these. This is for a number of reasons: first, it keeps the title centered; second, it is keeps the template following the standard (of the 23,000 non-meta templates using Navbox, only about 5 now use navbar=plain); third, it makes the template easy to access for editors (it should be easy, not hard, for editors to edit these templates, as they are fairly low risk). Also, I made a few other edits that move data out of the "above" field and into the "list1" field. The {{Navbox}} code is going to be updated on May 1, and it might pose a problem if no listN parameters are defined (according to the latest database dump, these are the only templates with that problem of the 23k navboxes). Thanks, --CapitalR (talk) 14:42, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Next Plane Home

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Next Plane Home, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Movingboxes (talk) 04:29, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the prod. Sorry about that. Movingboxes (talk) 04:36, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Power Ballad

Great idea on that merge!! I'm curious though - is the history only retained through looking at the original article? I guess that makes sense. Either way, great idea, thanks! Luminifer (talk) 05:43, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maintenance Templates

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. HalJor (talk) 04:56, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of maintenance templates

Hey there, when reviewing your contributions I noticed you've removed some maintenance templates from several articles with the reason given that they have been in place since 2007. If a tag has been in place that long then all the more urgent to fix that issue not just remove the tag.. a maintenance tag should not be removed without first addressing the problems that the template states. If you have checked over the article and found that the tag is unwarranted or the issue has been fixed then it's ok to remove it, using the edit summary, "removing tag, issues were addressed", but not before. -- œ ^™ 02:31, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Janelle Pierzina

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Janelle Pierzina. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janelle Pierzina 3. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:45, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Custard Records artists and bands

Category:Custard Records artists and bands, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:38, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Tomomi Itano. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 03:10, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked the page for capitalization mistakes, and there are none. I have also provided a valid reason in the edit summary. Wiiki pe dian 03:15, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The End's Not Near, It's Here for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The End's Not Near, It's Here is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The O.C. episodes from season 4, volume 1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Gh87 (talk) 16:48, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Wiikipedian. You have new messages at Talk:iPhone 5.
Message added 06:19, 10 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Marcus Qwertyus 06:19, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Board of directors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public corporation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:39, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Wayne Callies main image

I know you have not edited Sarah Wayne Callies in a few years, but you are one of the heaviest contributors to the article. Would you care to give your opinion at Talk:Sarah_Wayne_Callies#2012_Main_infobox_images.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:34, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Before reverting

Reply to my talk page post, I addressed it all there, IT'S ALL IN THERE, as I said, I'll be happy to move the LTE reception section to whatever section you want if you can provide me with a reason instead of linking me to some shit, non-guideline/policy essay.

Again, please stop reverting and reply to my talk page post, I'm willing to compromise if you're willing to cooperate, I waited an entire day for Jimthing to reply to my talk page post, which he didn't before moving anything. I would appreciate it if you can display the same courtesy by doing the same; I hope you can understand why I would be frustrated when I specifically posted two paragraphs that directly address the issue that you raised in your edit summaries but both being ignored and you reverting it back without addressing either paragraphs. YuMa NuMa ^Contrib 06:27, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kiss Carly Rae Jepsen

Hey, as someone more involved in the writing of the song I keep editing, I can assure you my information is correct. I have proof, but not a web page I can reference or anything like that on the internet. Do you have any advice on how to proceed and keep the true information current? Do you know of any Wikipedia copyright boards, etc.? I've already reported Bryan Folk to Apple and all respective copyright offices of the true writers, so in that regard it's taking care of. Thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.214.99.194 (talk) 17:30, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. I didn't personally write the song, but I'm 100% correct that the 3 did. I did everything you did though and contacted everyone involved and even a few extra. Added 1 source now and multiple more will be added soon once they're made available online. :) 98.214.99.194 (talk) 04:44, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sorry I'm confused about your redacted messages comment. What do you mean? 98.214.99.194 (talk) 09:05, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for removing the discogs stuff. I have no problem with the fact you posted, just have a problem with some random kid named Bryan Folk trying to take credit for something he didn't do. I know I might come off as annoying by removing all your edits, but it's very frustrating when you know the truth, but have to deal with a giant like Wikipedia spreading false information. Like I said before though, proper credit is coming soon. 98.214.99.194 (talk) 18:10, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use of File:Sony Ericsson logo.svg

Thank you for uploading File:Sony Ericsson logo.svg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jonteemil (talk) 00:44, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]