User talk:WikiDamedit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, WikiDamedit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:59, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jimfbleak .Thank you for the information.I will keep in mind.Also if I may know the edit which had a conflict of interest so I will know exactly what I should not be posting in future as I am new to this. WikiDamedit (talk) 15:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

Thank you for declaring that you have no conflict of interest. That doesn't mean you can write what you like, you must follow the guidance below:

  • you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
  • Your only reference was a bare url link to its own website, clearly not an independent third-party source as we require
  • The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
  1. significant coverage in
  2. independent,
  3. multiple,
  4. reliable,
  5. secondary sources.
Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.
  • Apart from the lack of proper refs, there are no real facts either. From your text, it has no headquarters, offices, staff, management structure, income or expenditure. For all we are told, it could be just the two founders working from home.
  • You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
  • The whole text is a fact-free promo, telling us what the organisation claims to do ... aims to create flourishing climate for mass entrepreneurship in India.... stimulate the local ecosystem for youth-led mass entrepreneurship... help produce 10 million entrepreneurs... 50 million jobs... Its goals are to unleash the potential of ME provides alignment within the ecosystem and mobilises action to address systemic obstacles... No evidence of course, that its actually done anything at all.
  • There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
  • You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:45, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi , thank you for the suggestion.As per you review I have now added reliable and in depth information with secondary and independent references.Please let me know if anaything else is also required.Thank You. WikiDamedit (talk) 14:46, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Courtesey ping @DoubleGrazing Qcne (talk) 14:47, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, WikiDamedit! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:59, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lopifalko was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Lopifalko (talk) 15:46, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Lopifalko, I have updated the pages of Draft:Global Alliance for Mass Entrepreneurship to multiple independent sources as per your suggestion and guidelines and would request to review it.I have added multiple secondary relible independent sources and also tailored the language to neutral point of view.Thank you. WikiDamedit (talk) 19:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:21, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 20:58, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@TimtrentHi, I have deleted the ld references and only kept the new ones.Let me know if this is ok now. WikiDamedit (talk) 11:02, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see you have submitted it for review. A different reviewer will Gove you their opinion 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:15, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Toadette (Happy holiday!) 08:45, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]