User talk:WikiDan61/Archive20080910

Archive created 2008.09.10.WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:53, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, WikiDan61, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Space Shuttle. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hollywood Blvd Cinema Bar and Eatery Request for Deletion

I added a reference section. I am still compiling more articles, and am working on editing the language of the article. Any feedback would be appreciated. ThanksMebe86 (talk) 19:17, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chapmans Pool

Sorry about the revert on the Chapmans Pool article. I reverted my revert back to your edits.--Theoneintraining (talk) 13:31, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hollywood Blvd Cinema Bar and Eatery Request for Deletion

Hi! Just wanted to let you know that I'll be spending the next few days editing the page I created on Hollywood Blvd cinema to make it sound less like copy. Can you give me any advice, as when I wrote it, I found all the information relevant. Is it the tone of voice? The references made?

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!Mebe86 (talk) 21:13, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Solemio.com speedy deletion

Sorry if I'm using the wrong line of communication but could you give me some input on how to make the article acceptable? I thought all the info I included was relevant and helpful and since I colected it on the sevice's website and I had inserted a link to that service I thought it was OK. Other doubt I have is regarding the name of the article and how to change it. Can you help me? Thank you Vanessa Rôla (talk) 15:10, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the input

Thank you for your help, I will rewrite it, include all references and hopefully it will be OK. It would be easier to just give up but since there are so few details on this matter I believe all contribute is helpful! Vanessa Rôla (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 16:16, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I translated Raymond Baratto from French to English.

I translated Raymond Baratto from French to English. You may want to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond baratto. --Eastmain (talk) 16:47, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flawless Execution

While the reason for deletion may be disputed, the article in all earnesty should be placed for speedy deletion, because not only is it badly sourced, but it contains no links, no categories, and most importantly it lacks any real context and information. Cheers Fatal!ty ^(T☠LK) 12:28, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It also seems as if the user that created the article is not updating it. This article can't stay the way it is, if you wish to expand it, by all means. . . --Fatal!ty ^(T☠LK) 12:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NOTEABLE DOCTOR

Hello-I see you are trying to delete my page for Dr. John Buster because you believe it is advertising. I am not sure what I would try to be advertising for this man. He is a professional doctor who has done many noteworthy things in his career and should indeed be included in an encyclopedia. He developed and led the world's first embryo transfer that resulted in a baby!!A huge scientific break through. I am trying to work on my wording so it doesn't seem so advertising and more straight forward so please give me a chance on this or give me any advice you would have. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JP ID MC (talk • contribs) 13:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of AFD notice on Raymond Baratto

This action was not appropiate - even though the article has been translated the AFD must run it's course and only then can the template be removed (assuming the article is kept) - accordingly I have replaced the AFD notice. Exxolon (talk) 23:22, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andre Caram

I noticed it was tagged for speedy deletion after restored it. Then I deleted it again. I just thought somebody was vandalizing the article. Sorry for any inconveniences. ZXS9465 (talk) 13:01, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will fix the new article I created -- Thanks.

I have no connection to any of the light bulbs companies, nor do I sell or intend to sell any of these products. I only created this article to bring about the knowledge and awareness of these "green products". I need to work on the page.

Here is a link of my page: [1]

Dreamliner888 (talk) 01:15, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hans Alfred Nieper

Thankyou for the comment. I am gradually putting the whole article on 'Hans Alfred Nieper' together. I will add references and citations. Some references and citations may need some time to be found. I am currently working on finding references and citations that I have not already attained. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkusSSmith (talk • contribs) 21:25, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My 'Paul is dead' grammar correction

Again I'm sorry for any mistakes I might be making on Wikipedia, it's just because I'm new here but i mean no harm. As for my grammar correction (though I spelled grammar with an 'E' :P) I do believe I'm right about the correction I made. I'll be glad if you reconsider.

The sentence is: "He would have been 28 if he had lived." which is contracted to "He'd have been 28 if he'd lived." The "lived" is in the past pluperfect state (i.e. the fact of his death is already accepted to have occurred in the past). It needs the "had" to achieve this tense and this sense.WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:32, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So is my new correction correct (it's not like it was in the beginning)? It is actually the 3rd conditional which refers to condition sentences in the past. In those sentences the condition gets had+V3 (if he had lived) and the result gets would have+V3 (he would have been 28).

Again, not correct. You've changed the whole meaning of the sentence. The idea "He would be 28 (today) if he had lived" (remember, the sentiment was expressed at the time that McCartney actually WAS 28!). I think it's best if you just drop this edit, and find another article to update.WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 02:51, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, in that case, my first change was the correct one. It refers to a condition sentence in the present, which is conditional 2. Conditional 2 means the condition gets V2 (if he lived) and the result gets would+V1 (he would be 28). There is no such a conditional that goes 'He would be 28 if he had lived', it's a mix up of two different conditionals. Again thank you, and I hope it will be correct in the end.