User talk:WikiNeedsEditing

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, WikiNeedsEditing! Thank you for your contributions. I am Doug Weller and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Doug Weller talk 18:55, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiNeedsEditing, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi WikiNeedsEditing! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Dathus (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:06, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Using talk pages[edit]

Please always sign your name using 4 tildes, eg ~~~~. Your edits to Talk:Göbekli Tepe are at best confusing. It's also important never to reply in the middle of someone else's reply. I hope you can fix your edits there to sort out the confusion. Ah, and try to avoid editing logged out. Doug Weller talk 12:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Coherent catastrophism for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coherent catastrophism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coherent catastrophism (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doug Weller talk 11:48, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of MystifiedCitizen (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:34, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]