User talk:WikiObserver12345

July 2014

Hello, I'm Solarra. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to User:Kunalsrivastavawiki, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ 話 ♪} ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 08:37, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Manoj Srivastava with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 08:41, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Manoj Srivastava with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. — LeoFrank ^Talk 10:24, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:28, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:45, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Daniel Case (talk) 17:47, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WikiObserver12345 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

mistake WikiObserver12345 (talk) 06:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't see any "mistake"; your behavior was objected to, it continued, you are thus blocked. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 14:04, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

please unblock me, since I did not do anything wrong by editing the article "Manoj Srivastava", as there are the following reasons given: please delete the page MANOJ SRIVASTAVA. This page was created by his son Kunal Srivastava for creating a fake image for Manoj Srivastava. Mostly all statements published in this article are wrong with the intense to push his father. Please check all the given links (references) given in the article. Most links lead to pages where is nothing about Manoj Srivastava, many links lead to exact the same websites and other links only lead to documents or websites which don't support at all the article. They only proof that Manoj Srivastava worked as an employee for different companies, not more and not less. He is neither an actor (where is the proof?), nor a film director (where is the proof apart from mentioning his amateur 9-minute film with his own son in the lead, which was never publicly screened at any festival - if so...where is the proof?), nor a film festival director (he was alway only an employee in different positions for different festivals - so where is the proof?), nor a producer (where is a proof?), nor an author of any book (where is the proof?). So please again check the article, its links and its relevance for the public. I don't support fake pages, especially not from persons who are pretenders. Please check with diverse people from any of the festivals, what was the position of Manoj Srivastava. Wikipedia is a platform for giving information on public interest. And this is here defenitely NOT the case. WikiObserver12345 (talk) 06:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please rethink the unblocking, as it is proved that I did not do anything wrong. Wikipedia deleted the article after they got aware of it and its nonsense content. So I was not wrong and the blocking should be undone. WikiObserver12345 (talk) 06:40, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]