User talk:Wikiidemon

Leave me a message here. Wikiidemon (talk) 15:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HI ROBERT GIDA!!!--Misortie (talk) 17:58, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, evil twin! - Wikidemon (talk) 18:01, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 18:07, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikiidemon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand nothing. I registered today and after two edits you deleted me, but why? I explained my username's choice (my second edit on Obama's page) and wikipedia accepted it when I registered it, what more could I do? Tell it to me!

Decline reason:

Blitheringly obvious attempt to impersonate another user. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:10, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikiidemon (talk) 18:13, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Explain http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Aabckr_Aabmo. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your explanation for your username is not remotely credible. You showed up on one article talk page heavily edited by an editor with a user name one character different from the one you chose. That's not a coincidence, and regardless you simply cannot have a username that almost perfectly mimicks that of an established editor. The fact that it seems likely that you are a sock of a blocked editor only adds to the reason for blocking, but the unacceptable (and clearly stalkerish) user name is reason enough. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 18:48, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]