User talk:Wikilibros.project
Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Wikilibros.project (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello, I see I am blocked as a sockpuppet. I think it happened because I don't know exactly how to use wiki drafting. I had a chance to study the figure Chin-woo Kim in the past and wanted to successfully draft a well-organized, clean wiki article on him. I had used one of my acquaintance's account to work on it when I had no account, but was blocked mainly because of the quality of the first draft with having errors on the way of making reference. And I decided to create my own account which is wikilibros now not to make damages to his/her account. And with following the same procedure, I saw the previous draft written with bk21english was automatically retrieved(I don't know how the process exactly works, I guess it's because the previous draft was not deleted). Therefore, I finished writing that draft as that was mine and I published the changes a lot with worries that those corrections(from hardworking) wouldn't be reflected or could disappear. I think that action was the trigger for the suspicions. I put a lot of time into perfecting quality of writing. If you unblock, I will try harder to contribute to wiki productions and I'll be careful not to ever be suspected of breaking the rules again.
Decline reason:
What you are describing is a violation of WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK. It was inappropriate for you to set up a new account to evade the block. Yamla (talk) 10:22, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Wikilibros.project (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Thank you for the reply. But the case is different. For the drafting experience, I borrowed the other person's account once and thinking that that would be improper and I created my own account for the first time. And this is the only one I have and am using. I don't possess multiple account definitely.
Decline reason:
Yamla is correct, in your first unblock request you describe block evasion. I am declining your request. PhilKnight (talk) 14:51, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.