User talk:Wikilrcs

what draft?

I reverted your recent edit, because that talk page is not the place to ask about a draft. User:Wikilrcs/Brouillon doesn't exist. You haven't made any other edits (that I see) and you have no subpages to your user page, so I'm not sure which draft you're asking about. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:07, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was brought to my attention that you might mean fr:Utilisateur:Wikilrcs/Brouillon. You could paste that content into a draft here and submit it for review. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:55, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Graham87 and Xaosflux: Could you move the sandbox (and its history) in fr-wiki to here? The subject is notable. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:38, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Xaosflux: All done, to User:Wikilrcs/Brouillon. Graham87 01:03, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert J. Vallerand (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert J. Vallerand and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Robert J. Vallerand, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 09:19, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikilrcs! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 09:19, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, If you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:10, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikilrcs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Robert Vallerand (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I would like to change my username in order to unblock the account. The new username can be: Robert Vallerand. Thank you

Decline reason:

I see that this account has previously signed a post as "Michael", indicating that it has been used by someone other than Robert J. Vallerand, which means that the user name would be misleading. Also, I see that the account has used the words "we" and "our" in referring to its edits, suggesting that the account may be shared; if so, then it cannot be unblocked, as Wikipedia policy is that an account is for one person, and shared accounts are not allowed. JBW (talk) Formerly known as JamesBWatson 14:32, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The proposed username is be acceptable if you indeed are Robert Vallerand. As a measure to prevent others from impersonating you, I'll have to ask you to please provide proof of identity via email to info-en

wikimedia.org. Huon (talk) 21:55, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

The page Draft:Robert J. Vallerand has been deleted, in accordance with Wikipedia's policy on speedy deletion. There were two reasons for the deletion, either of which alone would have been sufficient. Firstly, the page was unambiguously promotional, reading more like a rėsumé/CV than an neutral encyclopaedia article. Secondly, it consisted largely, if not entirely, of material previously published elsewhere. It is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. We don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account. You should also read Wikipedia's guideline on conflict of interest before doing any more editing relating to yourself or anyone associated with you. JBW (talk) Formerly known as JamesBWatson 14:23, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]