User talk:Wikipcontributor800

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Wikipcontributor800, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Wikipcontributor800, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jožo Nižnánsky (January 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jožo Nižnánsky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 22:31, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could I have been told why cited resources are not reliable ?

Whats wrong with resources? How to make resources reliable? Or which is resource reliability pattern.

I have made reference to each fact.

I would be glad to have explanation on my draft decline. Wikipcontributor800 (talk) 22:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to point out that the way of citing I have used is quite common on wikipedia see:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%A1n_Sokol_(bishop)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jorge_Arroyo Wikipcontributor800 (talk) 10:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, and even in your own article

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Magg Wikipcontributor800 (talk) 11:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to point out that the way of citing I have used is quite common on wikipedia see:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%A1n_Sokol_(bishop)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jorge_Arroyo Wikipcontributor800 (talk) 11:03, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Yoshi24517. I noticed that in this edit to Trnava, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 20:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yoshi24517. Thank you to be attentive.

I have just transfered History of Jews to the section on demographics and rename it to ,,Jews in Trnava.

Reasons: Because in fact it not suited well to general history of the town.

(The Jews were always a small minority, not participating on general events)

But is more suitable, according to content of that passage to historical development of demographics, as it has been established by previous edits.

(In fact, if you read, that passage, you will see, that it is about development numbers, i.e. demographics of Jews)

Glad to see your opinion, regards. Wikipcontributor800 (talk) 20:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Trnava, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I do not remove it, I only MOVE IT to another part of article, in order to systematize! I am ready to discuss, but please read first. Wikipcontributor800 (talk) 20:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss on that. Its more suitable in part Demographics. I will wait until your answer. But try to read first. Wikipcontributor800 (talk) 20:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not clear to me that you moved it to a different part of the article. I only saw you delete a large section of sourced content. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:37, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to make a move.

This part ,,Jewish history" to rename ,,Jews in Trnava"

and

move it to ,,Demographics section"

Waiting for an answer. Wikipcontributor800 (talk) 20:41, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no opposition to moving it but you should discuss this on the article talk page. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for instruction. I will do it that way. Wikipcontributor800 (talk) 21:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Slovak heraldry[edit]

Hello, Wikipcontributor800,

Thank you for creating Slovak heraldry.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi Wikicontributor. There are some issues with your new article on Slovak heraldry. Firstly, the translation into English is not great. Can you re-visit and improve it? Secondly, more reliable sources are needed, and you should name the regions owning each of the coats-of-arms. Lastly, I would suggest adding the article to appropriate Wikiprojects.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 21:27, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for reviewing. I really appreciate your suggestions.

I will be grateful for helping that article.

I have the intention to improve it gradually.

As to English Im not native, translations were done by myself rushingly at first hand, but I feel that article should be started someway.

Would be useful to point me out that particular parts to be done. Wikipcontributor800 (talk) 22:01, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Wikipcontributor800 (talk) 22:00, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Slovak heraldry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doľany. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jožo Nižnánsky (March 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by The Herald were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jožo Nižnánsky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:49, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]