User talk:Wikipedia Sovereign

Greetings. I am the Wikipedia Sovereign. Wikipedia Sovereign (talk) 14:45, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Sovereign, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Wikipedia Sovereign! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Adding material regarding Donald Trump Conspiracy Theories[edit]

Hi there -- I noticed that you recently added significant material to the article for Conspiracy theories of the United states presidential election, 2016. First and foremost, I want to commend you for your interest in contributing to this encyclopedia. We always need more editors who are willing to write content! For this specific article, I removed a large portion of the material that you added because it was not substantiated by inline citations to reliable sources. Although you provided a number of footnotes with links to articles about Trump and his campaign, the content you added was not explicitly stated in those sources. Per WP:OR, "[a]rticles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not clearly stated by the sources themselves." Please also keep in mind that information presented in Wikipedia articles must be given due weight per WP:WEIGHT. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions, and I look forward to working with you in the future. All the best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 01:50, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

American politics notification[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Johnuniq (talk) 03:34, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

I'm sure you know the drill: here. LavaBaron (talk) 05:20, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 09:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikipedia Sovereign (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hear ye, hear ye. I am an innocent man; my only crime was loving the encyclopedia too much and bringing it a much-needed balance. This place is rapidly being overrun by pro-Trump neo-nazis who would do anything to protect their feckless leader's being bathed in the cold air of Truth. Come, free me from this icy prison and join me, as I restore my well-founded edits to the Conspiracy theories of the 2016 Election article, which only purported to claim that there is a conspiracy theory that trump suffers from a disabling mental disorder of Narcissistic Personality Disorder or worse, a claim which I cited by appeal to reliable sources documenting the fact that a U.S. congressperson has introduced a bill in the House to require Trump to pass a psychological fitness examination in order to assume the presidency, as well as referencing a number of reports from thought leaders in the mental health field diagnosing Trump as mentally unbalanced. The article is a repository for conspiracy theories, and this one is both are delicious and better supported in reliable sources than the silly claim that HRC has a neurological condition based on some doctored photos. Release me and join the side of reason, friend. I was recently named Wikipedia's "Best New Contributor" for the month of August 2016.Wikipedia Sovereign (talk) 16:24, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Declined, and block has been extended from 72 hours to indefinite, for wasting our time. Yamla (talk) 16:48, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ANI notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Gaming the system?. Thank you. Guy Macon (talk) 04:46, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Trump campaign controversies" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Trump campaign controversies. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Trump campaign controversies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 10:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]