User talk:Wikiwala Jat

July 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Fragrant Peony. I noticed that you recently removed content from Langah (clan) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fragrant Peony (talk) 14:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes man I am trying to recorrect the origin of langah tribe which is mentioned as jat in earlier source if you want to clarify more in this topic I can provide you source on this matter than you Wikiwala Jat (talk) 14:49, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Janjua, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Din oz1 (chat?) (he/him) 16:38, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Puran Mal, you may be blocked from editing. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 04:57, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Langah (clan). ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:55, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Langah jats fake rajput claim[edit]

Check your eyes sir langah clan is mentioned as jat. how you can considered them as so called rajput Wikiwala Jat (talk) 08:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:45, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I just want to clear you blocked me without any reason i assume it's. some kind of misunderstanding

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikiwala Jat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Wikiwala Jat (talk) 08:44, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Your reason here" is not a reason to unblock you. When you make a new request, your initial statement should replace the words "Your reason here". You are blocked for disruptive editing, you will need to discuss that in your request. 331dot (talk) 09:02, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.