User talk:Wikiwonderhouse

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Wikiwonderhouse! This is your Talk page, where other Wikipedia users might drop you a message from time to time related to any edits you make. You'll notice that we have dropped a 'badge' on this page, which shows that you are involved in the Conway project. Thanks for taking this first step! If you reply here, please make sure you type in {{U|ConwayDigi}} to your message which will give us a notification. Thank you! - ConwayDigi

Projects

This user is a participant in WikiProject Conway Library

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

needs independent sources to establish any notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Wikiwonderhouse/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Wikiwonderhouse/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:09, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikiwonderhouse! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:09, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Charles W. Tracy has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Charles W. Tracy. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 13:44, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Tracy (art historian) (August 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Really, this is too slapdash. The assertion that "He is recognised as an expert in English church woodwork, especially carved chests and choir-stalls" is backed up with five references, but one is by Tracy (I didn't read it, but doubt that it says "I am an expert" or anything like it); one looks at first sight to be a book titled Afterword but actually is the afterword to a book of a different title; one is a search page from the V&A which (unexpectedly) does not call him an expert but merely cites him; one says that "[his] specialism is church woodwork and furniture" (OK); another does seem to say this but my connection was dropped in mid-download of the vast PDF, and it's an unpublished PhD thesis, something we really shouldn't be citing. This is all rather important, because elsewhere the draft says very little about Tracy's accomplishments. Yes, he's had all those books published, but in this draft only the single latest volume has any commentary attached. My hunch is that Tracy richly deserves an article; of course a draft does not need to be polished, but it really ought to be more persuasive than this. I trust that the second draft will be more convincing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charles Tracy (art historian) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Charles Tracy (art historian), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 06:08, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]