User talk:Wikpdanerdsarebad

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. --Wetman (talk) 07:33, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Sock puppetry, you will be blocked from editing. - Rileydutton (talk) 07:34, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007[edit]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Bongwarrior (talk) 07:36, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikpdanerdsarebad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I feel an indefinite block is too lengthy and with it, that the punishment doesn't fit the crime. I was just having some fun with sock puppets! And who doesn't love fun with sock puppets?

Decline reason:

We're not your playground. Spebi 07:43, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikpdanerdsarebad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Despite it not being a playground, which I disagree with, I still feel indefinite is unjust.

Decline reason:

Opinion noted, but you are wrong. Wikipedia is meant to be an encyclopedia, and not anyone's playground - this is policy. Your account is only used for vandalism, and you seem to imply that it's a sockpuppet account - both of which make you liable to an indefinite block. Request to unblock denied. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 09:44, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.