User talk:William Ackerman
Welcome!
Hello William Ackerman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Landon 01:43, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
- Also, have fun at Wikipedia, but not to the extent of vandalism ;)
Images[edit]
Hi,
I have used some of your images on french wikipedia (see fr:Théorie de l'approximation:
and some people ask me for lincense of these images.
Could you please indicate, what are the rights of them (GFDL, Public domain, etc.)
Sorry for advance for my poor english.
You can send me a message to fr:Utilisateur:Oxyde
Thank you very much fr:Utilisateur:Oxyde
Help researching info on MIT graduate Ed Seykota[edit]
I need help writing the article about Ed Seykota, I need help researching his time in MIT, I need access to MITs library. I want copies of his thesis, papers etc. I also need official documentation about his degrees at MIT. Please help.
trade2tradewell (at) yahoo (dot) com - Replace "at" with "@", and "(dot)" with "."
Thanks
--Trade2tradewell 20:24, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Floating-point arithmetic[edit]
Gidday... I included both not just because Archimedes needed both, but because from the two sequences a quadratically convergent sequence can be formed, the (2I + C)/3 column, thereby demonstrating that a good method can be ruined by computational errors in the numbers going in to it. However, it took me so long to mark up the columns of digits that I was worn out, and didn't have the energy to adduce explanations, nor employ the schemes for presenting formulae in better form as you have done. Alas, one must occasionally attend to the tasks one's employer sets. If you like, I could send you the trivial Pascal prog. that displays the numbers with colours instead of bold/plain text, via RNMcLean and yahbhoo comm More seriously, in your discussion you speak of subtracting 1 from a number very near to 1. But, the values of the t(i) sequence increase rapidly, indeed t(i) = pi/6*2**i so sqrt(1 + t**2) is soon well away from 1 But this is all wrong! The formula is pi = t(i)*sides, in other words t(i) heads to zero as sides = 6*2**i. Now the first formula does indeed cancel out the 1 in sqrt(1 + t**2) - 1, whereas the second does not. The way to consider this is via f(x + eps) = f(x) + f'(x)*eps + etc. in other words, differentiate the formula. The second form has t, heading for zero, divided by a number near 2 on each stage. Nice and stable, whereas the first has a number near zero both on the numerator and the denominator. When I can think straight I'll try to differentiate the formulae. (I'm attending the Wellington Film Festival; four dozen films in sixteen days...) I also distracted myself by pontificating on the summation algorithm you gave a reference to; from the pseudocode it took me a long time to recognise a scheme known from student days... Being short on sleep doesn't help. Oh well, and now to resume work proper, delayed by a local ISP choke. NickyMcLean 01:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello. I've been distracted from the floating-point article for a couple of weeks and I'm quite suprised by how much it has changed in that time. In reworking the intro you seem to have reverted the text drastically to a much early version focusing on floating point as a numeral representation. There is some discussion on the talk page about why this was changed that you have not added to. In particular:
Floating-point is a system of arthmetic that operates on a particular representation (also called floating-point).
You've also reverted the intro to the claim that floating-point numbers are representations of real-numbers. This makes no sense and there is much controvesy on the subject on the talk page. All floating point numbers are instances of a set that is a sub-set of the rationals. There are no irrational elements, and so it makes no more sense to call them Real than it does to call them Complex. As a result there is now a clash between the description at the top, and that later on.
If you feel that these changes improve the article then could you please explain why on the talk page. Thank you. Amoss 16:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Meaning of cleanup tag on Floating point[edit]
I see that Earle Martin put a cleanup tag on the FP page on 8/14. He left this message on WP:Cleanup :
"Floating point - this article is very scrappy and poorly organized. -- Earle Martin [t/c] 13:34, 14 August 2006 (UTC)"
- Would you agree with his diagnosis?
- If so, do you have an ideal blueprint in your own mind for how this reorg should be done?
Since he's not a regular contributor to the page he must be referring to very general issues about how the sections fit together. From my limited knowledge the 'Cleanup' tag is often put on pages that have horrible problems, which this one doesn't. (At least, superficially it doesn't. Perhaps intellectually...).
- It might be worth requesting Peer Review (which could give arguments for an improvement scheme, if you have one in mind). EdJohnston 20:06, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
As per the remark buried in the text for Computer Representation and mentioned on the talk page, I have been contemplating reducing the IEEE aspect and specifics in Overflow Underflow and Zero in favour of a more general description, with references to the IEEE article instead, which itself might be extended. Likewise, adding exemplifications of the actual computer realisations of fp numbers on different computers, perhaps each format as its own article - full conformance in every last detail to the IEEE standard is not so common. It is all very well to call for a cleanup, but actually doing it requires time and patience. A larger-scale cleanup is a larger task. Regards, NickyMcLean 21:46, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
I had looked at Floating point with an eye to doing a cleanup earlier in the summer, but got distracted. I'll take another look. Thanks to all that have been working on it. It gets linked from so many places it would be nice to get it to featured article status (at some point). Jake 21:12, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
IP address 161.88.255.139[edit]
Hello. I saw that you were also surprised by the IP address you're seen as within Wikipedia. We actually work for the same employer, so I can provide some info on the IP address (I'm not at work at the moment, which is why I show a different IP in my sig here). The address that you see (149.59.167.71) is your IP address within the corporate intranet. However, when we go through the corporate firewall, we all share a fairly small set of IP addresses that are assigned by a proxy server. I'm not certain if the same proxy IP addresses are shared by all divisions, but they are certainly shared by users in both major offices in the US, and possibly by all users within the division worldwide.
When I first learned what was going on, there were already several warnings at User talk:161.88.255.139, and I placed the small blurb at the top of the page. Sadly, because of the shared nature of the proxy address, we all suffer whenever somone within the corporate firewall uses their connection to vandalise this site. --24.19.60.17 03:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- FYI: There are at least two proxy addresses used. 161.88.255.139 and 161.88.255.140 - you will always use one or the other, I believe it depends on your division in the company as to which proxy you are assigned. There may also be other proxies used by other divisions that I haven't yet seen. --161.88.255.139 16:53, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Evgeny Yakovlevich Remez (1896-1975) and Approximation theory[edit]
The on-line resources in English usually spell him Remez (including the American Mathematical Society). See for example [1]. Most of his work is in Russian, though he wrote his name 'Remes' in his French-language publications. This is germane to Wikipedia since there is already a WP article Remez algorithm, which is hard to link to from the section on Remes in Approximation theory if the names are spelled differently. How would you feel about changing his name in that article? EdJohnston 14:39, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Abramowitz and Stegun[edit]
I'd like to check the widely-used Dover edition to see if it still says '1965' as the publication date, and what printing it claims to be. People appear to believe that the hard cover is more correct, but I don't know what the differences are. If the differences are on line somwhere, we could point to them. I'll try to get hold of a paper copy, before answering your question at Talk:Orthogonal polynomials. EdJohnston 22:38, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
floating point[edit]
I need to bring expert attention to the floating point page. I believe that there is a serious general disgreement between me and NickyMcLean. Let me first say what this is not:
- It's not a yelling-and-screaming (or reverting) dispute, and I don't want it to become one.
- I don't think that the usual mediation/arbitration/general formal processes are called for.
- It is not an issue of vandalism. All parties are well-intentioned.
The real problem is that floating point is a rather esoteric subject. There aren't many experts in the field, and I would like to get their advice. I believe that what Mr. McLean is doing is misguided relative to what the Wikipedia page should be saying on the subject. (BTW, I consider myself an expert.)
The talk page already has a request at the bottom, from Mr. McLean, for experts to weigh in. (He clearly recognizes the dispute.) None have done so, though the serious problem has only been around for 4 days. I assumed that the experts have the floating point page on their watch lists, and would say something.
I've considered dropping notes on the talk pages of the experts (as determined by looking back through the edit history over the last year or so), and asking them to come over and look. Should I do this? Should I wait a while? Should I request some kind of formal bringing of expert attention? William Ackerman 19:04, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- I've added the {{expert}} template to the article, but that may not have the effect you're looking for. I think that leaving messages for users who have previously edited the article is completely acceptable, and would help to resolve this problem. If you have more questions, feel free to restore the {{helpme}} tag--this article is waaaay out of my area of expertise and so I can only comment generally. -- Merope Talk 19:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
As one of the so-called experts I'm happy to participate. However I'd suggest using Peer Review because (1) that's a lightweight process that's little more than a focused exchange of views among the people you asked, and (2) you can see if the experts have any ideas in common, hoping to move to a consensus. I think this would give us a list of ideas for improving the article. If you have more thoughts on what's needed, feel free to send mail via 'Email this user'. EdJohnston 01:05, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
How to welcome people[edit]
No admin necessary. Put this in (without the "nowiki", of course.)
==Welcome== {{subst:welcome}} ~~~~
Your A&S template becomes even more famous[edit]
I was able to convert a normal reference to A&S in Student's t-distribution to use your templated form, so readers can click on the online copy [2]. There may be other statistics pages where this would be useful. At present Template:Abramowitz_Stegun_ref seems not to tolerate a decimal point in the chapter field (like 26.2) which is the only limitation I've noticed. EdJohnston 19:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Mozart for those who don't mess around[edit]
Bill, I don't have an email address for you, so I'm contacting you this way. I thought you'd be interested in this -
http://www.daedalusbooks.com/Products/Detail.asp?ProductID=54113
The recordings that I've listened to (out of 170 CD's I've listended to 20 or so scattered throughout the box) are very nice - a nice mix of original instruments and BIG 1970's GERMAN ORCHESTRA type recordings. At the price, I thought I'd get a bunch of 3rd-rate minor orchestras - not so, they're almsot all very nice.
If you're feeling a little masochistic, this is also VERY nice -
http://www.daedalusbooks.com/Products/Detail.asp?ProductID=55970
The last three months I've been working mostly for Philips Lighting.
Stay in touch. David Boundy PatentProcedure 0x40 gmail 0x2e com
sorry[edit]
sorry for vandalizing wikipedia, I just got carried away. 69.250.130.215 23:01, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Mathematics CotW[edit]
Hey William, I am writing you to let you know that the Mathematics Collaboration of the week(soon to "of the month") is getting an overhaul of sorts and I would encourage you to participate in whatever way you can, i.e. nominate an article, contribute to an article, or sign up to be part of the project. Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks--Cronholm144 00:23, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Eutrophication article[edit]
Please see the history [[3]]. What happened there (to which you or your bot was a party) is somewhat confused. While it's true that 161.88.255.139 [[4]] was engaged in vandalism, what happened next doesn't seem right. I'm writing to alert you to the possibility that there may be a bug in your bot. William Ackerman 16:03, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks William Ackerman for the heads-up on the situation. I went back and looked to see what was going on and you are right. There was vandalism that was than reverted, than re-vandalized and etc – etc – etc.. And sorry to say User:161.88.255.139 got caught in the middle of it. Regarding the bot, yeah it can be overly aggressive at times, especially regarding the placement of warnings on the users talk page. That is why I have included the sentence; “If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.” And placed warnings on both my user and talk pages. I know that this is no excuse, especially when you are the one that has been giving the warning. If it is any consolation, I was also on the receiving end of this particular bot, by an other editor who is using it. I have gone back and removed the tag from User:161.88.255.139 discussion page and replaced it with a copy of this response. Hope this helps. }}Shoessss talk
Re: Vandalism to Horace Greeley High School[edit]
Currently, the activity from the IP isn't high enough to justify page protection or a block, but I'll keep an eye on it. Thank you for the notification, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 23:57, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting[edit]
 |
New England Wikimedia General Meeting | |
|---|---|---|
The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future!
| ||
|
| |
| Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England! | ||
Message delivered by Dominic at 09:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.
You're invited: Ada Lovelace, STEM women edit-a-thon at Harvard[edit]
| U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited! | |
|---|---|
 |
Now in its fourth year, Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields. Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either. 00:49, 5 October 2012 (UTC) |
2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting[edit]
You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 09:55, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18[edit]
| NE Meetup #4: January 18 at MIT Building 5 | |
|---|---|
|
Dear Fellow Wikimedian, You have been invited to the New England Wikimedians 2014 kick-off party and Wikipedia Day Celebration at Building Five on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology campus on Saturday, January 18th, from 3-5 PM. Afterwards, we will be holding an informal dinner at a local restaurant. If you are curious to join us, please do so, as we are always looking for people to come and give their opinion! Finally, be sure to RSVP here if you're interested. I hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk) | |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)
You're invited: Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March[edit]
| Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March - You are invited! | |
|---|---|
 |
New England Wikimedians is excited to announce a series of Wikipedia edit-a-thons that will be taking place at colleges and universities throughout Massachusetts as part of Wikiwomen's History Month from March 1 - March 31. We encourage you to join in an edit-a-thon near you, or to participate remotely if you are unable to attend in person (for the full list of articles, click here). Events are currently planned for the cities/towns of Boston, Northampton, South Hadley, and Cambridge. Further information on dates and locations can be found on our user group page. Questions? Contact Girona7 (talk) |
You're invited![edit]
| NE Meetup #5: April 19th at Clover Food Lab in Kendall Square | |
|---|---|
|
Dear Fellow Wikimedian, New England Wikimedians would like to invite you to the April 2014 meeting, which will be a small-scale meetup of all interested Wikimedians from the New England area. We will socialize, review regional events from the beginning of the year, look ahead to regional events of 2014, and discuss other things of interest to the group. Be sure to RSVP here if you're interested. Also, if you haven't done so already, please consider signing up for our mailing list and connect with us on Facebook and Twitter. We hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk) and Maia Weinstock (talk) | |
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)
Edit-a-thon invite[edit]
On May 3rd, the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem, Massachusetts will be hosting a Native American and Chinese Art edit-a-thon from 9:00-5:00 pm. You are more than welcome to attend, as there will be free food and drink, and an outing afterwards. If you are interested, please sign up here, as we would love to see you there!
If you have any questions, please leave a message at Ed Rodley's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.
Adrianne Wadewitz Memorial edit-a-thons[edit]
| Adrianne Wadewitz edit-a-thons in Southern New England | |
|---|---|
 As you may have already heard, the Wikipedia community lost an invaluable member of the community last month. Adrianne Wadewitz was a feminist scholar of 18th-Century British literature, and a prolific editor of the site. As part of a worldwide series of tributes, New England Wikimedians, in conjunction with local institutions of higher learning, have created three edit-a-thons that will be occurring in May and June. The events are as follows:
We hope that you will be able to join us, whether you are an experienced editor or are using Wikipedia for the first time. If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list. | |
New England Wikimedians summer events![edit]
| Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians! | |
|---|---|
|
After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested:
Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August: If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list. | |
New England Wikimedians summer events![edit]
| Upcoming events hosted by New England Wikimedians! | |
|---|---|
|
After many months of doubt, nature has finally warmed up and summer is almost here! The New England Wikimedians user group have planned some upcoming events. This includes some unique and interesting events to those who are interested:
Although we also aren't hosting this year's Wikimania, we would like to let you know that Wikimania this year will be occurring in London in August: If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list. | |
This Friday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA[edit]
You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:28, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, William Ackerman. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Sunday July 16: New England Wiknic @ Cambridge, MA[edit]
| Sunday July 16, 1-5pm: New England Wiknic | |
|---|---|
  You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" at John F. Kennedy Park, near Harvard Square, Cambridge, as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck.
We hope to see you there! --Phoebe (talk) 16:33, 12 July 2017 (UTC) | |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, William Ackerman. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, William Ackerman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Herm5.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned raster image that was not used to create the corresponding vector image and thus is not needed for attribution
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 01:22, 14 January 2024 (UTC)