User talk:Willkm

Welcome!

Hello, Willkm, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Lord Voldemort ^{(Dark Mark)} 16:52, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

cherwell valley

I appreciate your argument that the Cherwell Valley is not in SW England. I have included it on that template to make navigation easier, since it connects the GWML with the midlands. there is a lot a traffic that goes on the cherwell route, including freightliners - perhaps there are route clearance issues on the cheltenham route. I can easily remove it from the template if it is a problem. This also raises the question of where to put the Thames branchlines. They should probably go with the GWML, but again aren't technically in the SW. Perhaps "Great Western" zone would be a better description of the area covered? What do you think? Our Phellap 23:43, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean. Just seemed a bit odd when I saw it! Yes, a Great Western "zone" would probably be better. I think something along the lines of BR regions would go well, although it would end up with some of them fairly big... What do you reckon? Willkm 00:21, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria Line

Thanks for pointing that out. I managed to read the diff the wrong way round - it had previously been "southwest to northeast" which isn't really correct, and the revision I reverted had actually *fixed* that. Oops. I've put it back the way it should be and chastised myself suitably in the log message..

(And yeah, nice userboxes!) --Mpk 13:27, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow!

Great work on the TGV article! In case you don't know this, it's scheduled to appear on the main page in a few days time. - Ta bu shi da yu 07:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Precisely! that's how I made up my username - both myself and my flatmate thought it was very amusing at the time. I originally created a throw away account on Kuro5hin, but ended up keeping it. Then when I transferred to Wikipedia, I brought the username with me :-) Ta bu shi da yu 04:08, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on TGV

Well, I did not expect a vandalism/silly edit within 15 minutes on the apperance on the front page, though... although the person who made the edit may have done it in good faith — what he wrote is a literal translation of Train à Grande Vitesse, just a bit too literal ;-) Anyway, there will probably be quite a bit of work like this in the next 23.5 hours... Schutz 00:25, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Got it

Okay, gotcha. Let me try to reword that bit. Killdevil 00:16, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TGV edits

I was endeavouring simply to make minor corrections to usage (redundant hyphens, omitted diacritical marks, omitted or redundant function words, misspellings, etc.). I have no idea why Service needs to be spelt with an uppercase S any more than I know why Hulk Hogan films need to be discussed, or why some pig needs to post obscene pictures there (Why pick on the TGV article, I wonder? Is the Barbra Streisand article getting to busy?) Anyway, I think the uppercase S was inadvertently reinstated as the result of an editing conflict. Sorry about that. I notice that you and one or two others have been relentlessly reëditing that page this evening (it is evening for me, anyway). I might question some of the edits (although not the vandalism reversion, of course) as they don't seem to change very much (for instance, I thought it was already quite clear that it was hard to read trackside signals the way it was worded when I edited it). But anyway... Kelisi 04:02, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TGVweb to Wikipedia

That's excellent news; congratulations on this. I'm happy to help (although it may have to wait for a few days). As for the permission emails, I don't need them personaly, but you can look on Wikipedia:Confirmation of permission for the right procedure to follow. Schutz 00:29, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure that if you have an email covering the whole website, that could do the job. Only important thing is not to forget to credit the source; maybe in the edit summary of the first edit (copy/paste the text, save with the right summary, and then edit), and, of course, on thep age itself (for example on the model if Template:FOLDOC).

Winchester College

In what way "wrong sort of house system"? Is it not, as the article explains, a case of: "Historically it was associated with established public schools, where a 'house' referred to a dormitory."? If it differs at Winchester, an explanation would be helpful, if you're in a position to provide one. Man vyi 16:03, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lux facta est! Your explanation of the hybrid system at Winchester could usefully be added to the article, if you wouldn't mind doing it. Thanks! Meanwhile, I'll try to tweak boarding house and house system. Man vyi 16:39, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Circle Line

Hi. Do you have a cite for the claim about Circle Line trains being turned at Whitechapel to minimise tyre wear? I'd be surprised if this was really an issue, because as the C Stock is shared between the District, H&C and Circle an individual unit would get plenty of different duties which would spread the wear out anyway. From what I understand, individual unit diagrams are virtually never simply 'from depot in morning, round and round the circle line, stable in the evening'. Circle trains regularly become H&C trains and vice versa over the course of the traffic day. --Mpk 10:00, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Circle page on CULG mentions transferring stock between the Circle and the H&S service in the evenings. I guess this does make sense for trains going out of service in particular, as there's no way for an Outer Rail train on the Circle to get to Hammersmith without reversing anyway. So if you can make a Circle train into an H&C train, you get to both strengthen the H&C in the evenings and get the train back to Hammersmith in a more or less elegant manner. --Mpk 18:06, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Train operating company

This is currently undergoing a merge proposal. Simply south 16:57, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FA Review

TGV has been nominated for FA review. As I see you're one of the main editors, I think you should be notified. Noble Story (talk) 02:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TGV

Great work on many of the TGV articles... I was expecting a wasteland on EN which needed to be translated but a lot of it is here already. gren グレン 17:57, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fawkham Junction for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fawkham Junction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fawkham Junction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 17:59, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]