Jump to content

User talk:WitKid

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your relationship to these one-edit users?[edit]

What is your exact relationship to these users? Please be completely honest, since a checkuser can reveal any deception.

-- Brangifer (talk) 03:32, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Roger13Zimmerman for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Irbisgreif (talk) 15:51, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sock puppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected to be a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. MuZemike 21:36, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WitKid (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Could you unblock me in 1 week from Wikipedia please? I went along with Roger13Zimmerman and put my comment into the Colorpuncture debate to Keep the article. This was the first time I used Wiki as an editor and was not aware of the meatpuppet or sockpuppet rules. I am aware of them now, and will follow Wiki rules in the future.

Decline reason:

Basically the same wording as on your other account, User talk:LesaLC. One account per person; this one will remain blocked since its sole purpose is done. Mangojuicetalk 15:25, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Before this request can even be considered, you need to give a full, complete and accurate answer to the question posed at the top of this page regarding your relationship to a number of other editors. In answering be aware of the fact that checkusers may have the ability to confirm or refute your answer. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 11:48, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]