User talk:WizardEditorCatBoy3126
WizardEditorCatBoy3126, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi WizardEditorCatBoy3126! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 27 June 2020 (UTC) |
alright thanks WizardEditorCatBoy3126 (talk) 20:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
[edit]
Hello, WizardEditorCatBoy3126. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Navin Noronha".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:22, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Sweater Whether moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, Sweater Whether, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – NJD-DE (talk) 21:50, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
April 2022[edit]
Hello WizardEditorCatBoy3126. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:WizardEditorCatBoy3126. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=WizardEditorCatBoy3126|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Your actions (uploading File:Abhitundel.jpg which is then used on User:Abhi Tundel) indicate you might be using multiple accounts. Unless there are good reasons this is usually not permitted. – NJD-DE (talk) 21:55, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- See also User talk:Some1something, User talk:Abhi Tundel. – Athaenara ✉ 22:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 23:23, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]
|
Nomination of Sweater Whether for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweater Whether until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:40, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
The Cradle moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, The Cradle, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I believe that it is WP:TOOSOON to know if this short film, shot in 6 hours will be notable. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lightburst (talk) 15:13, 20 August 2023 (UTC)