User talk:Wlindley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See:

An example of superimposing (combining) two icons together to create a missing one, using the Superimpose template:

Maps I'm working on--

Consider adding new section "Impact" to METRO Light Rail (Phoenix) --

By November 2007, even before the system opened, $6 billion in new projects were planned or being built along the line, including many condominiums and office towers along the Central Avenue corridor which are to be built by 2013.[1][2]

I am not related to this ^^^^ comment.

"West's Most Western Town"[edit]

This has not been accurate since prohibition of new horse corral construction.

Hopiakuta 01:43, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Former Scottsdale police chief Doug Bartosh in March of 2008 admitted: "Scottsdale certainly is not the West's Most Western Town anymore. It's a progressive city..." Wlindley (talk) 20:12, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page comments[edit]

Hi. Please don't edit others' comments on talk pages. Wikipedia is not censored, so swearing is fine in moderation. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:03, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

true Rosiedanugbtugn (talk) 16:39, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rocker jacket[edit]

Hi, you participated in the hoax discussion about Rocker jacket in August 2009. I have created an AfD for this article at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocker jacket. Best, Cunard (talk) 07:44, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Holbrook[edit]

Hello there. You created Holbrook (Amtrak station) originally, and I've having trouble verifying that Amtrak ever stopped there. Cheers, Mackensen (talk) 13:00, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source was a newspaper article, but examination of [www.timetables.org] suggests Holbrook may not have ever been an Amtrak stop. Wlindley (talk) 03:16, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Woodward Avenue Light Rail[edit]

I was kind of playing around and previewing the page. Just a suggestion, but if you put the new schematic map in the "overview" section, it makes the page a bit more aesthetically pleasing. Play around with it a bit more and see if you can get it to look a bit cleaner. Thanks for making, this, though. I want this page to be brought up to the respectability of other transit line pages, both existing and planned, but I don't have the skills to do it, by myself. Keep up the great work, whatever little you can do to improve it definitely helps. --Criticalthinker (talk) 03:16, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Phoenix Trolley Station[edit]

Thank you for bringing up the fact that the structure was once a dental office. I let myself go by the sign on the structure. I should have done a lttle more research on the structure, but you know how it is, sometimes a person's brain doesn't function right with the high temperatures in Arizona. Tony the Marine (talk) 16:16, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I-805[edit]

Hey, there! I reverted your edit to Interstate 805 because I thought it made more sense to elaborate that the freeways themselves were being constructed. I'm not sure how removing that information removed any kind of redundancy. Can you please elaborate? TCN7JM 19:11, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't revert again until we have this sorted out. For one, I think it's good to elaborate that the freeways themselves are being constructed, not just "I-5 and I-8". Second, "Interstate" does not completely imply "freeway"; there are some non-freeway stretches of Interstate highway still left out there. TCN7JM 22:59, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Atbenson.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:24, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Wlindley. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Wlindley. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Z-Train[edit]

Notice

The article Z-Train has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Long-dead rail service proposal that never got beyond an initial round of press releases. No updates in the press since 2010.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:21, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:VMR lines[edit]

Template:VMR lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:57, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:VMR stations[edit]

Template:VMR stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/VMR left/Valley Metro Rail[edit]

Template:S-line/VMR left/Valley Metro Rail has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 08:01, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/VMR right/Valley Metro Rail[edit]

Template:S-line/VMR right/Valley Metro Rail has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 08:01, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:VMR color[edit]

Template:VMR color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:VMR color[edit]

Template:VMR color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of United Rail Passenger Alliance for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United Rail Passenger Alliance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Rail Passenger Alliance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:32, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Ficker, Jeff (2007-11-12). "Light rail doesn't derail plans". bizAZ magazine. Retrieved 2008-03-09. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  2. ^ Holstege, Sean (2006-12-24). "Light rail spurs rush of private development". The Arizona Republic. Retrieved 2008-03-09. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wlindley&oldid=1149811322"