User talk:Wnk.ana

Feedback on your article[edit]

Hello Wnk.ana, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. While your tutor will judge it content wise, I will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay.

Intro sentence: good!
Links: good!
Headers: sufficient, but no need to capitalise the C in "Historical Context". Usually we only make the first character of a header capitalised, unless it is a given name.
References: Thank you for starting with inline references. But you need to use much more references: the common practise is to add a reference behind every paragraph, and after every two or three sentences.
Other: Please make less text bold, normally we use bold text only in the first sentence. Use Italics instead of bold.
Ready to publish: No. References are besides good writing the most important part of Wikipedia articles. Without inline references, an article is not ready to be published.

I hope you can already implement this feedback to your sandbox article before our coming meeting today. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 09:05, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Please look if you can expand the historical context. Also "great impact" is vague and needs clarification.

And the reception of the book is still missing. Please use "Reception" instead of "Criticism", also good receptions need to be included. Romaine (talk) 09:27, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wnk.ana, You asked me to look at your page again.

Links: usually we only link in an article only once to another Wikipedia article. It is not needed to link multiple times to Franz Hartmann.
References: Please add them behind the dot, instead of before the dot, and no space between dot and reference. References have been improved. I would suggest also to add a reference after the last sentence of Historical context.
Reception/21st century: still missing.

Coming Monday morning early I will review again. Romaine (talk) 16:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]