User talk:Wobbs

The site you mention has not been on Wikipedia in months. The only place I see it is on the talk page, where users long before I became a member complained that someone was spamming the site and removing an established resource, Pink Floyd and Company, a first-page Google hit. I have no interest in any of these sites personally, but have devoted my time to improving the Pink Floyd article as much as I can.

I was in the midst of defending keeping your link on the Pink Floyd article to User:Longhair when you posted an unsigned message to my talk page. Most suprisingly, while previewing this message to you I found that you vandalized my talk page and removed two comments from other editors, about unrelated matters entirely. Suffice to say, I won't be defending your link anytime soon with this kind of behaviour. - dharm a bum 09:48, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the apology. No worries, mistakes are made, especially in what can be an unfamiliar forum such as Wikipedia talk pages. I'm sorry if I've been terse, but I've been going through a lot of arguments about what is and what not appropriate for external links in the past couple weeks, and my biggest concern is that external links will have to be done away with altogether to settle these arguments. For the record, I think your site is worth keeping, but (assuming you or someone you know has been) removing the link to Pink Floyd & Co., that's the main thing I have an issue with. Also, in terms of Wikipedia policy, please sign your comments on talk pages with four tildes like this ~~~~, as it lets everyone know who is making comments and keeps the conversation flowing smoothly. Thanks, and once again, sorry if I was snippy. - dharm a bum 10:18, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]