User talk:Wojciech.aniszewski
Re:MDB's For Lies I Sire 03:51, 17 June 2009 edit.[edit]
Well, some of that stuff wasn't very encyclopedic, to be honest. For instance, citing references is against wikipedia policy, due to it not being a reliable source for factual information. The best place to put professional reviews is in the professional reviews section in the infobox. Also, the following section displays opinions.
| “ | It contains violin parts, reminiscent of band's old era, but musically it can be described as a continuation of A Line of Deathless Kings, due to similar guitarwork, harmonious vocals (ofted doubled) and growl vocals being a rarity. | ” |
Yes, it could be described as a continuation of A Line of Deathless Kings, but it isn't a fact that it indeed continues the previous album; it would just be something that a person would think to themself. Also, there is no real way of knowing that the feedback is mostly favorable, due to the fact that htere are many reviews of this album, and not all of them will be positive. To say that reviews were mostly favorable is an assumption. However, I think I can re-introduce the information about the band posting on their website the information of the album-promoting tour. Thanks for your interest. BacktableSpeak to Meabout what I have done 19:26, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
-- Ok, I guess I'm kinda satisfied with this answer. I just couldn't watch Lies_I_Sire being so uncommented :) I don't think you need to reintroduce the information. Regards. --Wojciech Aniszewski 13:37, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Nomination of Neil (software) for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil (software) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.