User talk:WonderBoy1998/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
August 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Publication history of Wonder Woman has been reverted.
Your edit here to Publication history of Wonder Woman was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://dc.wikia.com/wiki/Wonder_Woman_Vol_4_1, http://dc.wikia.com/wiki/Wonder_Woman_Vol_4_2, http://dc.wikia.com/wiki/Wonder_Woman_Vol_4_3, http://dc.wikia.com/wiki/Wonder_Woman_Vol_4_4) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to an external Wiki, then please note that these links should generally not be included (see 'links to avoid' #12).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:28, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Zeus Dc Comics.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Zeus Dc Comics.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:37, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Wonder Woman Star Sapphire Walking.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Wonder Woman Star Sapphire Walking.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello WonderBoy1998,
I've seen that you have been working on the Wonder Woman and History of Wonder Woman articles quite a bit recently. There is a book which I think you would enjoy. It's "Wonder Woman: Amazon. Hero. Icon." by Robert Greenberger (ISBN 0789324164). It was published by Rizzoli Universe Promotional Books in 2010. I've finally gotten around to using it for a few citations to the History of Wonder Woman article which I've been working on for quite some time. It's good to see someone else taking an interest in this article as well. Happy editing!
Mtminchi08 (talk) 02:24, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you! I'm surely gonna love it! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 13:08, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
IGN
Do you work for IGN, by any chance? -- AppleBsTime (talk) 13:37, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Wonder Woman GA
Hi, I noticed you put Wonder Woman up at Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Assessment hoping for a GA assessment. GA assessment is not done under the WikiProject. Instead, you'll need to follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Good article nominations. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 21:20, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks the information! :) --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:54, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, just quickly looking over the article. You may wish to reduce the number of non-free images. Generally speaking images regarding the characters appearance/costume (i.e. things that cannot be adequately described in prose) are okay but illustrating the plot is not. Still all non-free images must have strong rationales for us. Hope this helps, good luck.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:47, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you! Can you please specify some images which you think I should remove. That'd be nice. Thanks again!--WonderBoy1998 (talk) 16:20, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- The main one that comes to mind is File:Wonder Woman stabs Darkseid.jpg, WW stabbing Darkseid, isn't something that needs to be shown in order to convey her strength. Prose will do just fine. Besides there is already another image of WW's New 52 costume. The rest of the images, you could probably make an argument for. Also covers are considered less intrusive on copy rights than interior panels, so use those wherever possible, for instance the cover of JL #3 or WW #1 might be better than File:Wonder Woman New 52 Jim Lee.jpg.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:05, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- Ya even I thought of that. I've deleted them. Thanks for the help! Hope it passes.
- Hopefully. It really comes down to how strict the reviewer is. Other helpful tips, make sure everything is verified. Reliable third party sources are better than primary sources.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 17:49, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, I'd go with the Wonder Woman #1 cover, not only is it the first cover of her solo new 52 series, but it also shows her deflecting arrows with braclets.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:37, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
File:Fortress of Solitude New 52.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fortress of Solitude New 52.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:44, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Wonder Woman Zeus Powers.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Wonder Woman Zeus Powers.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Wonder Woman stabs Darkseid.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Wonder Woman stabs Darkseid.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Writer's Barnstar |
| I'm actually surprised how you have actually made the Wonder Woman article such a informative and large article by adding so many expressive sections! Keep up the good work. ReflectionsofSwans (talk) 07:29, 3 November 2012 (UTC) |
- Thank you so sos oso so much! :D--WonderBoy1998 (talk) 07:37, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 18:21, 4 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Redtigerxyz Talk 18:21, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by —Theopolisme 17:28, 5 December 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
In response to your feedback
I see you have edited quite a lot, but I will link you to our startpage nonetheless; there are many useful links there. Cheers and happy editing.
Lectonar (talk) 10:08, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Wonder Woman Star Sapphire Flight.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Wonder Woman Star Sapphire Flight.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Wonder Woman Star Sapphire Flight.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Wonder Woman Star Sapphire Flight.jpg, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use. (See section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WonderBoy1998 (talk) 04:53, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zola (DC Comics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Invader (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Loca
Sure thing, I'll start the peer review now. WikiRedactor (talk) 17:29, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
RE: Loca : Need help! (And some Wikiproject Shakira talk)
I'll take care of the charts for you! As for the labels, I was referring to adding the label in which the song was released, in this case Epic Records. In regards to the release history, I looked at the references, and based on the citations, it appears that the "all versions" information is incorrect. Personally, I'd remove that label from the table altogether and just leave it as "digital download".
I agree that it makes sense to improve Shakira's English-language works first, since they are the ones English speakers are likely most familiar with. Then, we can get into the Spanish-language songs and so on. Hope this helps! WikiRedactor (talk) 19:51, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- It sure does! :) --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 05:55, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Did It Again (Shakira song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:04, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Estoy Aqui
Hi there! Thank you for taking the time to review "Estoy Aqui"! I have addressed most of the issues you addressed, though there has been some difficulty in expanding the music video section. I have added the screenshot as requested, though information on the video has been very limited. I was only able to pull a Billboard review and another fact about its promotion. I'll keep looking for more, but I tend to doubt that much more information will be dug up. WikiRedactor (talk) 01:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Loca GAN
I'll take your "Loca" off your hands if you take my Flashback, as it seems that Erick isn't interested. Deal? :) — DivaKnockouts 04:51, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
*opens mouth and looks above* Er, never mind. :P But honestly, I've been busy with college so I don't have too much time in my hand to make reviews. Erick (talk) 06:40, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- Hahahahah! No problems! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 06:41, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
All at once. xD Sorry for not letting you know. Hehe — DivaKnockouts 07:10, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Flashback (Ivy Queen album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
RE: Loca Loca Loca!
Good job! It's great to see someone stepping up to fix these Shakira articles! WikiRedactor (talk) 20:09, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Re: Did It Again
Would you like for me to leave comments on the talk page? Anyways, you know how to use the status bar at the top of your user page. Right? — DivaKnockouts 23:52, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
- Alright! I'll see if I can get to that this week. I owe you since Flashback is sooo big. xD And oh okay! I thought so ;) — DivaKnockouts 03:09, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
The Latin Pop Songs is a subgenre chart of the Latin charts so it's inclusion is usually limited. I don't see the need for Tropical Songs in either case as it's also a subgenre chart unless the song was re-recorded in a Tropical genre and was released on radio stations. Erick (talk) 04:11, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
- According to WP:BILLBOARDCHARTS, the Tropical Songs chart can be used regardless. Honestly, the Latin Pop Songs and Latin Rhythm Songs charts should be made this way too, and their respective Airplay and Digital charts be added if they haven't charted on the main genre. — DivaKnockouts 14:23, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Re: Need Help with Release History
Oh man. I wish I could help but I'm no good at these sections either. I know how to do simple ones but that is just about it. /: I would keep all the references and just redo the table because what the original editor was trying to do is pretty unknown to me. — DivaKnockouts 14:26, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah. I don't know what that is about, because when you open the links it's an EP not download bundle. Haha — DivaKnockouts 12:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 03:06, 27 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
— Statυs (talk, contribs) 03:06, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
RE: Year end charts
No. Year-end charts are annual charts by the chart publisher that ranks the best-performing songs of the year. See Billboard Top Latin Songs Year-End Chart as an example. Erick (talk) 16:37, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to She Wolf may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- ref> "Why Wait" draws inspiration from the work of English rock band [[Led Zeppelin]] and contains [[[Middle Eastern music|Middle Eastern]] rhythms.<ref name=shewolfbillboardreview /> The lyrics
- | note14 = Remix) (featuring [[Kid Cudi]]
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:46, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
About "I ripped you off"...but don't panic!
I noticed that you have used some content from one article and placed it into another. This is actually ripping someone off if you don't attribute their work when you use it. To do this, all you have to do is add an edit summary when you merge the content into the desired article. It must be something like "Content from [[Original article]] has been copied into [[merged content article]]. This is an absolute or you are violating copyright as all content on Wikipedia is covered by a CC 3.0 license which requires proper attribution of any and all contributors of the content. The edit summary is the minimum for proper attribution. If you do nothing else, this must be done. Should you fail to add the proper edit summary after you have merged the content you can simply make a Dummy edit and add the attribution to that edit summary. Just mention as well in the summary that it is a [[Dummy edit]] with a link. If you have questions you can direct them to the Teahouse. You could leave me a note with any further questions but I shut down my talk page for a short while. Going on Vacation. Happy editing and congratulations on your first GA article.--Amadscientist (talk) 08:46, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
- "you have used some content from one article and placed it into another"- no I didn't? Lol I was just kidding there. The contents on both the article is really different. I was just telling Divaknockouts that I copied the title "Songs and repertoire". The content is totally different. I meant that i just copied the title. It was just a joke.....but I noticed the way I put it was a little misleading, sorry for that. The thing is, I was reviewing DivaKnockout's article Flashback (Ivy Queen album) and I really liked the title "Songs and Repertoire" in one of its section. So I used the same title in the article I was editing She Wolf (Shakira album), but the content of both the articles is pretty different. You can see that yourself. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 09:58, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 22:50, 30 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
— AARON • TALK 22:50, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Re: Lol I Ripped You Off copied your title
Lol, honestly the editor above should of inspected both articles and would have found that you didn't "rip" anything off of anyone. You re-wrote that entire section by yourself and it looks great :). Anyways, that title I actually "ripped-off" from this article, and just changed "Background" with "Songs". I reviewed it for GA-class a few months back. — DivaKnockouts 23:32, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:27, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited She Wolf (Shakira song), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages IRMA and Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
July 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to She Wolf may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- //www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/rockandpopreviews/6282342/Shakira-She-Wolf-CD-review.html|work=[[The Telegraph (UK)|publisher=[[Telegraph Media Group]]|accessdate=July 1, 2013|date=October 13,
- | note14 = Remix) (featuring [[Kid Cudi]]
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:49, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- I hate you.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Did It Again (Shakira song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- {|class=wikitable
- |Germany<ref name=amazongermanyrelease>{{cite web|title=Did it Again {Single)|url=http://www.amazon.de/dp/B002UZ2FWY|publisher=Amazon.com|accessdate=July 11, 2013|location=
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:12, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Latin American certifications
First of all, you're welcome. 
. Now then, I just thought I'll tell you, as I told WikiRedactor before, about finding certifications from Latin American countries. The Spanish terms for certifications are "Disco de Oro" for Gold, "Disco de Platino" for Platinum, and "Doble/Triplo Disco de Platino" for Multi-Platinum. So when you use Google, you would for example search (in quotations) "Disco de Platino en Colombia" for whatever artist and/or album you're looking for. Hope that helps! Erick (talk) 04:57, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I originally was really keen on the album and did a lot of the early work to make the album page a good page. I lost touch with it and forgot about the album. I dropped by the page and I must say you've done a stellar job with the page. It looks better than I could have ever imagined. Well done. It thoroughly deserves to be a GA. I made a few minor alterations to help but seriously man, good job! — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 16:21, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:41, 18 July 2013 (UTC)