User talk:Wonderpet

--Wonderpet (talk) 12:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Welcome![reply]

Hello, Wonderpet, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -SpuriousQ (talk) 03:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Trinity appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you.--C.Logan 09:35, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 18:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Inserting the same unverified POV edit over and over again is vandalism. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Marvin Shilmer (talk) 19:58, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Antichrist

I think you went a bit too far in your recent edit to Antichrist. You removed two sections instead of one. Did you really mean to remove the "Seventh Day Adventist Beliefs" section? Please restore that if not.

Also, you can expect User:MurderWatcher1 to restore the "Dispensational (Christian) beliefs" section you deleted. See that user's talk page for a discussion I opened regarding that section after I placed the {{copypaste}} tag on it. I'm trying to open a dialogue with the user, but they haven't yet responded. Wdfarmer (talk) 06:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you're right, I did remove the adventist bit along with the copy/paste I removed and it was not intentional. I wonder though does it belong in the article? Wonderpet (talk) 12:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think so. The article has other discussion about the views of different religions on the topic: Islamic, for example. I think you should put the section back unless you have a real reason for removing it. Wdfarmer (talk) 20:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Nerd has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 21:12, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, I believe it is constructive Wonderpet (talk) 21:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's not for random acronyms you made up in school. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 21:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Being used in a Simpson's episode once doesn't make an acronym notable. If you can cite it to a reliable source, then add it in. If you can't, don't. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 21:27, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that that's a reliable site. Looking through Google, all I find is Myspace and such. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 21:33, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]