User talk:Worstershire

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Worstershire (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me, this is not what it seems to be. You see, I registered this account in hopes that I would contribute to Wikipedia with only the best best best content. But almost immediately, my account and password was hijacked by that blasted Ichträgtkeineschuhe, and thus, he continued by making whatever edits he pleased. That is probably why you associate the two accounts. But I can assure you this, I have since changed my password and I KNOW that this user will not come back, why would he? This account has served his bad-faith purposes. So I ask kindly, that I may be unblocked so that I can make positive contributions, something I was not able to do yet. I am gennuine in my wishes to keep this encyclopedia great, if only I am given a chance. Thank you.

Decline reason:

This is one of a series of abusive sockpuppet accounts you have created. You will not be unblocked. Gwernol 01:45, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Worstershire (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had absolutely nothing to do with those sockpuppets, by saying this without evidence aren't you assuming BAD faith??

Decline reason:

Using the exact same excuse as VillDuHaEttGlassVin? Denied. — IrishGuy ^talk 01:50, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please note: If you post the {{unblock}} template one more time with the same exact reasoning, I will ask an administrator to lock this page. 02:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Okay, thanks.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Worstershire (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please, stop thinking we're stupid. — ²¹⁰physicq (c) 02:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.