User talk:Woufeq

September 2023[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 22:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Woufeq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

An Administrator accused me as a sockpuppet of Buevell. I even dont know well about this user. I just restored removed edits which seemed legit to me. I didn't look over who were the blocked users. This is totally a shocking to me. I seek unblock definitely. I didn't vandalize Wikipedia, I respected Wikipedia's policy while editing and gave references whatever I found for the edit. Woufeq (talk) 22:58, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't think this is a coincidence. 331dot (talk) 07:19, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Woufeq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Just because some edits are similar with a previously blocked user, now I am the sockpuppet of that user? I would like to request to see my edit history. I have restored many removed edits of other users too. I see injustice with me. Its my only account and I am not responsible for other's contributions here. I want to be unblocked for obvious reason. I will help Wikipedia with my best and will improve myself Woufeq (talk) 21:41, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser data is consistent with previously blocked sockpuppet accounts. However, the data is too stale to make a definitive finding. Nevertheless, this significantly strengthens the justification for the block. Yamla (talk) 20:23, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

more You are free to access your own edit history; it's under "contributions" at the top of the screen(depending on your preferred skin/appearance, it may be in a drop down menu). Yes, editing the same topics as a blocked user is generally considered sockpuppetry, or more specifically meat puppetry. If you can provide a plausible explanation for doing so, please do. 331dot (talk) 20:05, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot:I know about Middle Eastern ruling family and I also know about South Asian countries' politicians. I am focused on their daily affairs and personal life. Additionally, I know about Islam and Medieval Arab era. I usually add missing informations which aren't included or I restore infos or references of these area which seems essential to me. Moreover, I really didn't care what was added by that blocked user. I added someone's spouse, which wasn’t in the existing page, anyone would do that who knows them. Now the administrator accusing that As I am a sockpuppet, I added the same info which I am not. A person's spouse is a certain person, its not that case which changes day by day. Now What's the wrong with my edit? I want to say another time that there is no relation between me and that blocked user. I seek unblock now.Woufeq (talk) 20:23, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla:I know about Middle Eastern ruling family and I also know about South Asian countries' politicians. I am focused on their daily affairs and personal life. Additionally, I know about Islam and Medieval Arab era. I usually add missing informations which aren't included or I restore infos or references of these area which seems essential to me. Moreover, I really didn't care what was added by that blocked user. I added someone's spouse, which wasn’t in the existing page, anyone would do that who knows them. Now the administrator accusing that As I am a sockpuppet, I added the same info which I am not. A person's spouse is a certain person, its not that case which changes day by day. Now What's the wrong with my edit? I want to say another time that there is no relation between me and that blocked user. I seek unblock now and I am not a sockpuppet of that account.Woufeq (talk) 20:26, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My findings had absolutely nothing to do with your edits. --Yamla (talk) 20:27, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have revoked your ability to send emails. --Yamla (talk) 12:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was warned by Bbb23 that "if I email *him* again, he will block me from e-mailing". I didn't email him rather I persnally mailed another user. So, this act confirms that Administrators intervene in personal emails. So, good!! Just because I am blocked, I can't even complain something suspicious? For getting blocked, my legitimate edits get reverted and another person smoothly removes references! Different rules for different editors? I also removed references sometimes, but then I got warned!! I want answer. Woufeq (talk) 18:14, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That's just an out-and-out lie. You e-mailed me complaining about another user. If you also e-mailed other people, I have no way of knowing. You are perilously close to having Talk page access revoked as well.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:54, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]