Jump to content

User talk:Writer-on-foundations

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy deletion nomination of The League of Peace Foundation[edit]

Hello Writer-on-foundations,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The League of Peace Foundation for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. {C  A S U K I T E  T} 01:02, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Writer-on-foundations! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Writer-on-foundations. You have new messages at Theonesean's talk page.
Message added 00:51, 6 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

{C  A S U K I T E  T} 00:51, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion[edit]

In my opinion, the editor that tagged your article was correct. So was the administrator that actually deleted it. Apart from the League of Peace Foundation's website - which appears to be a single page with not a lot going for it - I can find one mention on Google of the organisation, and that is only in the blurb section of the link. The actual target doesn't seem to mention the League. If there are no reliable independent sources, there won't be an article. It is up to you to prove to us that the League is notable. As it is, it would seem to shun publicity and contact, and I am going to respect that and leave the article deleted. Peridon (talk) 13:15, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]