User talk:WritingMan

Welcome

Hello, EricGrunwald, and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are a course instructor leading a class project.

New to Wikipedia or want to learn about best practices for Wikipedia assignments?

Go through our online training for educators

The training includes instructions for setting up a structured course page, with tools for tracking student work and encouraging peer review. Please also see this helpful advice for instructors.

If you run into problems or want some feedback on your Wikipedia assignment plans, try posting to the education noticeboard.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay after your assignment is finished! -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 14:31, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Work by User:Taeseop

This student inserted what appears to be an interim work product into article space. I moved it into draft space. Please monitor and advise the student. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:35, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Murder on Via Bel Poggio

Hello, WritingMan. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "The Murder on Via Bel Poggio".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 10:49, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback

I left you feedback here. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:11, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed topics

1)adsfajsdkfj

2)asdjfas;kdjfa

WritingMan (talk) 22:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

yest

asdkfaksdjflkasjdfl;kasjdlkfjl

WritingMan (talk) 22:24, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Meetup/Grunwald/Istanbul/ICSLS 2019

A tag has been placed on Meetup/Grunwald/Istanbul/ICSLS 2019 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Created in the wrong name space. This is in article space, not Wikipedia: space.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 14:33, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

physicist article

Hi @WritingMan:! this is alie from our WikiEdu class. Just a heads up that I shared your wikipedia user name with the scientist on twitter working mainly on German > English translations and researching solid state chemists, physicists etc. I don't have her Wikipedia user name but hope she might respond on your talk page if that helps any with the research/references list. If you like when the article is done goes live, I think you can advertise it to the Women in Red Project since they'd be very interested in the content. This is where they keep the master list for new articles re: women in physics. Nanobright (talk) 01:28, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Haneda Airport Access Line Plan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Haneda Airport Access Line Plan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haneda Airport Access Line Plan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:29, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

mail

Hello, WritingMan. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--Woches (talk) 22:59, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bundled images

Hi, Writing Man.

You're probably not the right person to contact about this, but I think you know who is the right person, and I'd like you to pass a message along to one of your colleagues.

Over the past year, I've encountered a large number of extremely narrow, specialized articles on topics in chemistry. They've all been written by MIT (graduate?) students over the past decade, apparently as a course requirement for a large number of courses.

Almost all of them tend to bundle multiple images together when they needn't do so. For example, File:Carbene-1.png and File:AlkyltrifluoroboratesBatey2002.svg each include two (somewhat related) different reaction sequences in a single image file.

Future editors may (and indeed I do) want to rearrange the article text to separate discussion of the two reactions. But such editors cannot move the discussions to far-separated places in the article without editing the image files to separate the two logically separate parts of the image. Switching "editing mode"s like that is annoying and unpleasant, particularly when it shouldn't be necessary in the first place.

I know that Wikipedia's ability to float separate image files together is not great, but the drawbacks to {{multiple image}} are often overstated. Moreover, most bundled images I've seen don't need to float at all — they are or should be marked |frameless|center! Keeping them together then requires no special effort.

Please ask your colleagues to stop teaching the students to bundle images, and instead teach them to unbundle images as much as possible.

Thanks, Bernanke's Crossbow (talk) 02:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bernanke's Crossbow,

I am not a chemistry professor, and although I used to have my graduate students (from various disciplines) write or update articles on Wikipedia, I have not done so for many years, although I don't know if any of those students were chemistry students. It sounds as though a professor or two in the Chemistry Department is having students do this, or perhaps their embedded writing instructors. I suggest you contact someone there.

best,

Writing Man WritingMan (talk) 12:58, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]