User talk:WritingPro1234

Hello, WritingPro1234. I noticed that your recent edit to 2019 Luzon earthquake added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 20:43, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

WritingPro1234, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi WritingPro1234! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Hello, I'm S0091. I noticed that you recently removed content from Tornado outbreak of March 3, 2019 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. S0091 (talk) 20:33, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello i'm very sorry I did not tell anyone I will tell everyone later in the future thank you for telling me

No problem. Thanks for the note. Do you know you how to add an edit summary? It does not appear you are currently doing so but is very helpful to other editors. S0091 (talk) 20:39, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

No I do not can you tell me how?

Sure! See H:ES, also H:TP has guidance about talk pages. Very helpful. I will leave you a welcome message with links to policies and other helpful information. I highly recommend the Wikipedia Adventure tutorial as well. It's interactive and walks you through policies and editing. S0091 (talk) 20:45, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Welcome WritingPro1234!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,206,416 registered editors!

Hello, WritingPro1234. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful: The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia A Primer for Newcomers Introduction to Wikipedia Wikipedia Training Modules Simplified Manual of Style Creating a new article via the Article Wizard

When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies: 1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly 2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources 3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources Brochures: Editing Wikipedia & Illustrating Wikipedia Ask a Question about How to Use Wikipedia Help

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 20:46, 5 May 2019 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)

Thank you I will see you in the future

Anytime! :) S0091 (talk)

Beauregard, Alabama tornado moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Beauregard, Alabama tornado, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:20, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Wutip

Im sorry, but I don't think Wutip qualifies for an article. The typhoon killed 0 people and inflicted a minimal amount of damage. I don't see any reason why that can't be covered in the season article (which it currently is). Noah^Talk 23:05, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Typhoon Wutip (2019

A tag has been placed on Typhoon Wutip (2019 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Correct subject title directs to a page that's already been created

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Comatmebro (talk) 23:50, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (2019 Papua New Guinea earthquake) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 2019 Papua New Guinea earthquake.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What were the casualties?

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Stevey7788}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Stevey7788 (talk) 22:14, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Understandable, someone vandalised my page deleting my history part. If you could do something about it Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by WritingPro1234 (talk • contribs)

The page was not vandalized. Mikenorton (talk · contribs) removed this material because it did not have any citations. All content on Wikipedia needs to be based on reliable sources—see Wikipedia:Verifiability. Any unsourced content that you add is liable to be removed. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 23:47, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

I should also clarify that it is not "your" page. Wikipedia is a collaborative project and articles may be edited by anyone. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 23:53, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

It is clearly being vandilized. Someone is deleting what I edit. I have the whole thing I put down so here it is.

First of all, please sign you comments on talk pages by typing four tildes ~~~~ after your message. This will automatically create a signature with your username and current time. Second, vandalism has a very specific definition on Wikipedia, and the edits you are referring to are not vandalism. The reason your additions were removed is that they don't not have any citations to reliable sources. Because you seem to have missed what I said to you above, let me be clear: any content that you add to an article that is not supported by a reliable source will be removed. You claim, for instance, that "more than 130 homes and a school were destroyed by the earthquake" in Lata Butu village; none of the news reports I've looked at verify this information, however. I have removed your unsourced edits once more. Restoring them without providing a reliable source is disruptive, and you may be blocked from editing as a result. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 16:38, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from 2019 Papua New Guinea earthquake. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 23:44, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

I'm very sorry but someone keeps deleting my stuff I edit I want to have my stuff on because it has good information I'm not trying to insult anyone. WritingPro1234

To be explicit about why I have removed your edits once more. The "Meteorological History" section is not only misnamed (meteorology is about the weather, not earthquakes), but pretty much repeats everything in the lead section. The lead section is supposed to be a summary of the article's content, not a repeat. The other statement that you have added are unsupported by the existing citations and should not be put back without adding further relevant citations. Mikenorton (talk) 14:15, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at 2019 Papua New Guinea earthquake shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mikenorton (talk) 14:22, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Sock puppetry

Please read Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. You appear to be operating two accounts - this one and User:She-Hulka, based on you both claiming 2019 Papua New Guinea earthquake as your project, supported by your writing style. If you have decided to change your username you need to be clear about that and retire the account that you're no longer using - see the linked page above with details of how to do that. If you continue to use two accounts without explanation, you are liable to be banned. Mikenorton (talk) 09:36, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WritingPro1234, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

B dash (talk) 02:45, 18 May 2019 (UTC)