User talk:Wryteracash

{{db-u1}} rationale=Kindly remove my page & account as the admins here believe that I should not be unblocked. Ergo, to save everyone's time, I would like the page & and the account be deleted permanently — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wryteracash (talk • contribs) 06:17, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Wryteracash, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Ravensfire (talk) 21:39, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. [spam.filmeekeeda.com] - note that if this site continues to be spammed, it can be put on the spam black list which WILL prevent adding future links. Ravensfire (talk) 21:40, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Wryteracash/sandbox[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Wryteracash/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 09:07, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:09, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Wryteracash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23842 was submitted on Jan 27, 2019 10:28:51. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 10:28, 27 January 2019 (UTC) kpscnaknvdsp[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wryteracash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi there, I extremely apologize that you considered the website citation as spam. Since the section didn't had the reception, I, therefore,added the same. However, I added two source links which according to you were not correct. Good enough. I sincerely accept the fault as per your guidelines. But I would like to make a kind request here - Kindly unblock me and provide me to add more credible citations. I would once again go to the rules page before I start adding anymore content on Wikipedia. I urge you to kindly consider my request for the same.

Decline reason:

This does not convince me that you will refrain from adding links to filmeekeeda.com in the future. It does not convince me you have read and understood and will comply with WP:SPAM, WP:EL, WP:RS, and WP:COI. All of these are requirements in order for you to be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 15:50, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wryteracash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi there, thank you for such a prompt reply. I assure that once I am unblocked, I will not post any links from the above-said website until it is not considered spam. I respect the rule and regulations prepared the reputed team of Wikipedia, therefore, I assure you that I will not repeat the mistake again. Furthermore, I would like to quote that I have bookmarked all the pages shared by you. Also, I would not make any further requests or try to convince you unnecessarily but respond to any further asked questions/ discuss the matter, only when needed.

Decline reason:

Saying "I will not post any links from the above-said website until it is not considered spam" means that you are still intent on editing about filmeekeeda.com, which shows that you don't yet understand the policies Yamla mentions above. In addition, I get the sense from your username that you are a paid editor and as such you must also comply with WP:PAID. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 16:14, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As I told you earlier, I won't make any further unblock requests, I stand firm with my decision. I respect yours. This proves that I am not a paid editor but a serious contributor who considers this as an experience. Thank you for your time. However, I would sincerely mention that I am not a paid editor and decline the alleged allegations. Also, a username is just for simple use and representation of an identity (chosen by the individual), therefore, saying that my username gives you a feeling that I am a paid editor does not become the reason for declining my request. I hereby rest my case with my firm decision & a concluding statement - I am not a paid editor but a serious contributor who does not carry any wrong intent.

It is certainly your choice to request unblock or not, but if what you say is true I would think you would want to request it. 331dot (talk) 16:30, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the meaning of guidelines 331dot (talk). My only intent is to be a part of right doings. However, I will only request for unblocking only when you think I should (and I am not a paid editor). Kindly, suggest me the timeframe for the same.

As I have reviewed one of your requests, I will not review another. If another administrator sees merit in unblocking you, they may do so without further consultation with me. 331dot (talk) 16:37, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's helpful sir. I will make another request.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wryteracash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi there once again admin. Kindly consider my account for unblocking. As discussed with 331dot (talk), I think I am able to prove that I am not a spammer. I have read (still reading more) the rules. Also, I will not repeat this mistake again.Wryteracash (talk) 16:42, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So when you repeatedly referred to Filmee Keeda as "my website", what you meant was that it was someone else's website that doesn't employ you at all? Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wryteracash (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So when I said this -"my website", all I was doing was trying to indicate towards the website chosen by me. That's it. Also, I apologize for the late reply as I was busy. So, now could you please unblock me because I am kind of tired asking for this. If you don't want to just say it, I will not waste anybody's time.

Decline reason:

I'm having trouble believing this, since the WHOIS search results for filmeekeeda.com says that the admin email is acash.writer at gmail. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 19:47, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Jpgordon: Nice catch. I'm very sincerely impressed. --Yamla (talk) 22:05, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid, you didn't catch hold of my words - I said I indicated towards the website. I never denied from the fact. Also, last time I did edit was for a page that had another website name also. Anyways, I don't find myself guilty of any charge. For any, if there are, I have already apologized. Kindly spare me & yourself from these talks. Since you don't want to unblock me, I request you to kindly delete this page and my account. It will be better for both of us. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wryteracash (talk • contribs) 06:08, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

– Athaenara ✉ 06:22, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]