User talk:Wugo/GBS Biblio
Comments[edit]
I hope you don't mind me replying here, but I thought it easier to keep the discussion in one place rather than fragmented on our talk pages. You may want to check out WP:LIST if you haven't already. Lists seem to be like snowflakes; as long as it's not in prose format, it's considered a list. Again, I have no experience with writing them whatsoever, but tables work well for Bibliographies (a type of stand-alone list). You may want to construct a lead section overview, and consider clearer headers. I'm not sure what "Premiere" denotes; how is that different than when it was published? "Remarks" may also work better as "Notes" to give you more leeway for what to include there. Also, and I know I keep pointing to this particular Bibliography, but I'm quite taken with it, Bibliography of Edgar Allan Poe uses the <ref></ref> template in its "Notes" header and even links to online sources of the text. Check out all of the links in the references to the Edgar Allan Poe Society, for example. This looks much cleaner and more professional than a plain [1] external link but serves the same purpose. You would also be able to cite, if not an online source, a book source for the works that are not available on the web; the first two works already listed, for example, may require a book source if nothing else is available. Nice start! María (habla conmigo) 13:40, 14 April 2008 (UTC)