User talk:Wumbla
|
Lewis and Clark Expedition
[edit]You asked for more detail in Lewis and Clark Expedition, but didn't say what was missing. Please add specific suggestions to the talk page, or—better yet—enhance the article yourself! —EncMstr (talk) 22:58, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
March 2009
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Scrubs (TV series). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jac16888Talk 17:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Wumbla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TheVaultDweller 21:15, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Final vandalism warning
[edit]Looking through your contributions, it appears that many of your edits are vandalism (some sneaky, like this[1], other more blatant, like your repeated changes to Chris Simmons. I'll go through your edits now and revert everything that is clear vandalism or dubious; firther vandalism will result in a block of this account. Fram (talk) 12:05, 16 March 2009 (UTC)