User talk:XenaAmazon

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

XenaAmazon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand....?

Decline reason:

After further investigation, it appears you were earlier blocked while using a different username. You don't have the right to create new usernames and continue to edit under a new name while blocked. If you wish to edit, please return to your first username, and request an unblock on THAT account... However, continuing to abuse multiple accounts in this way will reflect poorly on you... — Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:37, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have contacted the adminsitrator that blocked this account. Please sit tight and be patient while we await his response. Thanks. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:06, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

XenaAmazon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

And why not? Its been a month already. You all can't hold a grudge for that long. And besides, I didn't do anything wrong.

Decline reason:

You appear to be banned. You may appeal this ban by filing a request for arbitration. If you wish to do this, say so on this page and add {{helpme}}. Stifle (talk) 10:55, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{XenaAmazon}[edit]

Initiated by XenaAmazon (talk)XenaAmazon at 17:33, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Involved parties[edit]

XenaAmazon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the reques

Diff. 1
Diff. 2

Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried

Link 1
Link 2

Statement by {Party 1}[edit]

Statement by {Party 2}[edit]

Clerk notes[edit]

This area is used for notes by non-recused Clerks.

Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (0/0/0/0)[edit]

I just want to know if I did the request right.

Not really. Request such as these are supposed to be made at WP:RFAR. Since you're blocked and obviously that page, you'll need to send ArbCom an email at arbcom-l

lists.wikimedia.org . Note that they may not accept to review your block, and any decision made by ArbCom is considered final and binding. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. - Sorry for the confusion above; Bans are rarely (so far as I know) referred to ArbCom, so the procedure is not commonly used. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:24, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You'll have a huge amount of explaining to do regarding your sockpuppetry, here and elsewhere, if you expect ArbCom to consider your appeal at all. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 21:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I just found some more of your accounts. Let me know if you create any more. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 21:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I know that. I admit, I did have 1 screen name, and that was Ineversigninsodonotmessageme. I don't use that name anymore, and that is why I created this name.

XenaAmazon (talk) 02:33, 11 April 2008 (UTC)XenaAmazon[reply]

You don't use that name anymore because you was blocked for sockpuppetry and disruption. You were blocked: not your username. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 03:34, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't disrupt anything, as far as I know. As for the sockpuppetry case, I'm sorry for creating 2 user names, but the rest wasn't me.

I just want to edit, and move on from this. Is that hard to ask?

XenaAmazon (talk) 16:33, 11 April 2008 (UTC)XenaAmazon[reply]