User talk:XkiritoWiki666

July 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Jv0314. Your recent edit(s) to the page United Russia appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jv0314 (talk) 14:46, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Serbian Progressive Party. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 14:53, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Burmese Way to Socialism, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 13:32, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But Burma Is Socialist so stop changing the damn government XkiritoWiki666 (talk) 13:33, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

burma is unitary state XkiritoWiki666 (talk) 00:57, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Angola. Acording to these sources^{1, 2}, Angola (Republic of Angola) is a presidential republic. --— — — Demonichellbringer (Discussion) 16:54, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:Demonichellbringer, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 00:01, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 14:45, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

plz unblock me wikipedia[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

XkiritoWiki666 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Racism XkiritoWiki666 (talk) 15:14, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:20, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.