User talk:Xoni98

Xoni98, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Xoni98! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:07, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

March 2020[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kosovo at the Olympics, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Amanuensis Balkanicus. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sport in Kosovo have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the teahouse. Thanks. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 18:32, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xoni98, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 14:25, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

– This SPI case is open. to – A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request. I accepted the rules so theirfore stop editing with multible accounts. Xoni98 (talk) 18:05, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xoni98, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Star Mississippi 02:31, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HEADER[edit]

This quick case is open.

username (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

I agreed that i did it I verfy it know Xoni98 Xoni98 (talk) 09:30, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xoni98, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Star Mississippi 02:04, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xoni98 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Xoni98 (talk) 09:27, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One request open at a time please. — Daniel Case (talk) 22:40, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1. I understand that you are a administrator 2. But i just want to share my own knowledge for the better for Wikipedia, their is still to less information in those topics i didn't intend to do an illegal thing. I apologize for my mistakes but everyone should get a second chances i never did anything to someone else to be blocked and if did it i feel sorry i wasn't knowing that. 3. I accepted that i created multiple accounts to give information into those topics i endited in. 4. Hopefully their will be a solution for this problem.

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xoni98. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 03:24, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason=Your reason here Xoni98 (talk) 09:22, 29 June 2021 (UTC)} I want to say sorry for my behavior i read the guidelines and want to apologize on my behavior. It is important to give me a chances so i can really improve on my behavior so i will change it. I want to say sorry.[reply]

Note anyone considering an unblock should see a sock's edits and the continued socking while this unblock is pending before unblocking. Star Mississippi 13:07, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xoni98 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Xoni98 (talk) 12:43, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Over at User talk:Egzonlatif25, you promised not to use this or any other of your accounts any more. We'll hold you to that promise. WP:SO may be available to you after six months with zero edits. Yamla (talk) 18:53, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I read the sock edits i agree that i edit many accounts i did a mistake and i read the guidelines aswell to understand the rules but want to say that i just wanted to edit to showcase more information in our sports since Kosovo and Albania have a rich sport history. And i want to say sorry for all i did but dont get me wrong i wasn't wanna going to edit to make you angry i just did it for information. And saying i wouldn't put any information in is not right i quoted many things in.

I understand the rules and hopefully can edit again and no i wont change the topic just add more things in talks with you.

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xoni98, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Star Mississippi 17:06, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Star Mississippi can you not give me a chances why is that when someone who just want to put some new things up get's criticize rather then helped i did with all the facts the things. Why do you like to see more pro serbian stuff in Sports in Kosovo but when i post something about the recent success of Kosovo in Football or Judo i get blocked for saying them! Xoni98 (talk) 08:06, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2. I agree what i did wrong mulible times still i never get an chances to get unbaned why ist that you guys have so much dislikes towards sports in Kosovo or Albania but when sports in Serbia is full with numbers and achievements , i see them can post and say whatever they like , can't we Albanians not mention our post aswell you let only Basketball in Albania to a little entent and by Albanian Basketball women you delete the whole post are they not important or do i get the feeling as when something isn't your way that it get removed sorry but i feel really unfair treated with all of this. While i also have a bit of a right i agree of what i did but atleast let's give a try it can't be that in both topics pro serbisem is still the focus. I cant mention that Albania beat Serbia but in the other hand you can mention the loss from Albania against Serbia ?! i dont get it why do you have so much hate towards what we did achieve since in Basketball / judo / boxing also Volleyball Albania and Kosovo did achieve great success Xoni98 (talk) 08:11, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

as John and I told you multiple times, we have no "hate towards" Albania. Our edits are because the info was unencyclopedic, unsourced. We tried to help you to explain how to edit. Instead you created multiple accounts when this and your second account weren't even blocked. It was socking that got you blocked, not the edits. Maybe someone else believes you'll stop socking. I consider myself to be involved and am not taking action on your unblocks, but they have access to the same evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Xoni98/Archive so I suggest you follow the advice Yamla gave you here. And definitely quit socking before you get banned. Star Mississippi 13:22, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll second what Star said. I know this thing about making you write a good block request in your own words sounds hokey. All we're trying to do here is make sure you understand what the issue is, and you're not just parroting back some script somebody told you to use. Believe me, what you write about basketball, judo, and boxing couldn't interest me less; those just aren't topics I care about. All I care about is that you understand our rules about having multiple accounts. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:34, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Page Access[edit]

Per this edit you confirmed you're only going to use that account, so I have removed talk page access on this account to stop the simultaneous unblock requests which unnecessarily clog the queue. Should you return in six months (per 331dot's decline and an admin considers the request to have merit, I have no issue with this account being unblocked as the primary account. Star Mississippi 13:25, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Star Mississippi 13:25, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xoni98, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Star Mississippi 19:00, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]