User talk:Xstepperson

We Deliver For You moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, We Deliver For You, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 07:15, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LeFT moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to LeFT. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and no categories and even the prose text says there's almost nothing about them. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 08:30, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: LeFT (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:LeFT and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 04:32, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xstepperson! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 04:32, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Twin-Method-The-Volume-Of-Self-Cover.png

Thanks for uploading File:Twin-Method-The-Volume-Of-Self-Cover.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:42, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Slaves-On-Dope-Klepto.png

Thank you for uploading File:Slaves-On-Dope-Klepto.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 06:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of A New Design (Album)

Hello Xstepperson,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged A New Design (Album) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the album, song or discography is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article of their own.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 06:21, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What? Im gonna make the other albums wiki page and the bands wiki page and why would I need to state why its in an encyclopedia??? Its information thats meaningful to people interested in the album why would you even want to delete it, its not like wikipedia is reserved for the most popular albums only its for everything. Xstepperson (talk) 06:30, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The page hasn't been deleted yet and an admin will make the final decision. Anyway the main problem with the article is the lack of sources and also that the band does not have a wikipedia page. If you were to start by writing a page for the band that is well sourced then pages for any recordings would be far more likely to be accepted (or at least not deleted). You should possibly read Wikipedia:Notability (music) particularly WP:NBAND and also WP:SOURCE. Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 06:41, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes ive read that and I will write a page later. Why are you pin pointing mine. What did I do I am just trying to bring more attention to this album and im pretty sure that Allmusic reference is good enough because many other just have that and are doing fine. Xstepperson (talk) 06:45, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, Any other reviewer would have nominated it for deletion or moved it to draft. In either case it is unlikely to be accepted for the main space as it is. Would you like me to move it to the draftspace for you or would you prefer for an admin to decide to delete or not? Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 06:51, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just leave it alone why not just leave a warning in the firstplace instead of rushing to delete it Xstepperson (talk) 07:00, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a place to bring attention to non-notable topics (notability as defined by that policy). Other articles not demonstrating notability doesn't mean your article can stay if it really isn't notable. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 06:56, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Dreadnaut-A-New-Design.png

Thanks for uploading File:Dreadnaut-A-New-Design.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:07, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LeFT-My-Disease-Cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LeFT-My-Disease-Cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Left-We-Deliver-For-You-Cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Left-We-Deliver-For-You-Cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Xstepperson! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 06:57, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:The-Deadlights.png

Thanks for uploading File:The-Deadlights.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Headplate-Delicate.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Headplate-Delicate.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Lifer-Lifer.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lifer-Lifer.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lifer (Lifer album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lifer (Lifer album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lifer (Lifer album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Schminnte (talk • contribs) 13:00, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Headplate-Delicate.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Headplate-Delicate.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Deadlights (album) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Deadlights (album), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 03:58, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Slaves-On-Dope-Klepto.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Slaves-On-Dope-Klepto.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lifer (Lifer album). ✗plicit 00:20, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ✗plicit 01:35, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt do anything Xstepperson (talk) 23:11, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Xstepperson, what you did was go against consensus when you reverted the outcome of the discussion that took place for Lifer (album), an article you created. At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lifer (Lifer album), there was clear consensus to redirect the article, so that's what was done here. You reverted the redirect back and were warned to stop. The following day, you ignored the warning and returned the article again. So, you can't say you didn't do anything. It's only a temporary block, so you can get back to editing soon. What I recommend is that you work on articles in your user space or sandbox and ask for help before publishing to Wikipedia mainspace. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 17:03, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Xstepperson (talk) 22:31, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lifer-Lifer.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lifer-Lifer.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Volume of Self for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Volume of Self is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Volume of Self until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:53, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Twin-Method-The-Volume-Of-Self-Cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Twin-Method-The-Volume-Of-Self-Cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Deadlights (album)

Hello, Xstepperson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Deadlights (album), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:08, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Deadlights (album)

Hello, Xstepperson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Deadlights".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:09, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]